Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NTSK vs PANW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NTSK
Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock

Software - Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$971M
5Y Perf.-12.7%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$138.16B
5Y Perf.+28.1%

NTSK vs PANW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NTSK logoNTSK
PANW logoPANW
IndustrySoftware - ServicesSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$971M$138.16B
Revenue (TTM)$709M$9.89B
Net Income (TTM)$-679M$1.28B
Gross Margin68.1%73.5%
Operating Margin-92.0%14.4%
Forward P/E53.3x
Total Debt$755M$338M
Cash & Equiv.$471M$2.27B

Quick Verdict: NTSK vs PANW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PANW leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NTSK
Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock
The Growth Play

NTSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 31.7%, EPS growth -69.1%
  • 31.7% revenue growth vs PANW's 14.9%
Best for: growth exposure
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
The Income Pick

PANW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.02
  • 7.5% 10Y total return vs NTSK's -49.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 0.89x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTSK logoNTSK31.7% revenue growth vs PANW's 14.9%
ValuePANW logoPANWBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsPANW logoPANW13.0% margin vs NTSK's -95.8%
Stability / SafetyPANW logoPANWBeta 1.02 vs NTSK's 2.10, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PANW logoPANW+4.5% vs NTSK's -49.3%
Efficiency (ROA)PANW logoPANW5.1% ROA vs NTSK's -53.1%, ROIC 17.1% vs -199.8%

NTSK vs PANW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NTSKNetskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription
53.9%$5.0B
Support
26.5%$2.4B
Product
19.5%$1.8B

NTSK vs PANW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPANWLAGGINGNTSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PANW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

PANW is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 14.0x NTSK's $709M. PANW is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTSK's -95.8%.

MetricNTSK logoNTSKNetskope, Inc. Cl…PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$709M$9.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$627M$1.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$679M$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$4.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.1%+73.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-92.0%+14.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-95.8%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.1%+41.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.9%
PANW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NTSK and PANW each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricNTSK logoNTSKNetskope, Inc. Cl…PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…
Market CapShares × price$971M$138.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$136.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.58x122.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.53.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple85.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.37x14.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share125.35x17.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF64.09x39.82x
Evenly matched — NTSK and PANW each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PANW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

PANW delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NTSK. PANW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTSK's 3.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTSK scores 5/9 vs PANW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNTSK logoNTSKNetskope, Inc. Cl…PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.5%+13.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.1%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-199.8%+17.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-91.7%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.88x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$284M-$1.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$471M$2.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$755M$338M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1559.00x
PANW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PANW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PANW five years ago would be worth $34,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,069 for NTSK. Over the past 12 months, PANW leads with a +4.5% total return vs NTSK's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PANW at 27.1% vs NTSK's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNTSK logoNTSKNetskope, Inc. Cl…PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-32.5%+9.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-49.3%+4.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.3%+105.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.3%+244.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.3%+746.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.3%+27.1%
PANW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PANW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PANW is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTSK's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PANW currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs NTSK's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNTSK logoNTSKNetskope, Inc. Cl…PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.10x1.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.99$223.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.67$139.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.7%+87.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.761.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.6M7.5M
PANW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates NTSK as "Buy" and PANW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.7% upside for NTSK (target: $20) vs 5.8% for PANW (target: $208).

MetricNTSK logoNTSKNetskope, Inc. Cl…PANW logoPANWPalo Alto Network…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.80$207.85
# AnalystsCovering analysts1386
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PANW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallPalo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NTSK vs PANW: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NTSK or PANW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netskope, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (NTSK) is the stronger pick with 31. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) offers the better valuation at 122. 8x trailing P/E (53. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NTSK or PANW?

Over the past 5 years, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

(PANW) delivered a total return of +244. 4%, compared to -49. 3% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PANW returned +746. 7% versus NTSK's -49. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NTSK or PANW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

(PANW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 2. 10β — meaning NTSK is approximately 106% more volatile than PANW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NTSK or PANW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netskope, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (NTSK) is pulling ahead at 31. 7% versus 14. 9% for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. grew EPS -56. 0% year-over-year, compared to -69. 1% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NTSK or PANW?

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

(PANW) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -95. 8% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PANW leads at 13. 5% versus -92. 0% for NTSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PANW leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NTSK or PANW more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTSK: 73.

7% to $19. 80.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NTSK or PANW?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is NTSK or PANW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

(PANW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +746. 7% 10Y return). Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PANW: +746. 7%, NTSK: -49. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NTSK and PANW?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NTSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; PANW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NTSK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PANW

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NTSK and PANW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NTSK: 31.7% · PANW: 14.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.