Software - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NTSK vs PANW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
NTSK vs PANW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $971M | $138.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $709M | $9.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-679M | $1.28B |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 73.5% |
| Operating Margin | -92.0% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.3x |
| Total Debt | $755M | $338M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $471M | $2.27B |
Quick Verdict: NTSK vs PANW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.7%, EPS growth -69.1%
- 31.7% revenue growth vs PANW's 14.9%
PANW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.02
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs NTSK's -49.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 0.89x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.7% revenue growth vs PANW's 14.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs NTSK's -95.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs NTSK's 2.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.5% vs NTSK's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs NTSK's -53.1%, ROIC 17.1% vs -199.8% |
NTSK vs PANW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NTSK vs PANW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PANW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PANW is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 14.0x NTSK's $709M. PANW is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTSK's -95.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $709M | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$627M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$679M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +73.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -92.0% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -95.8% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +41.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +57.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTSK and PANW each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $971M | $138.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $136.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.58x | 122.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 85.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 14.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 125.35x | 17.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 64.09x | 39.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PANW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PANW delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NTSK. PANW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTSK's 3.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTSK scores 5/9 vs PANW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | +13.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.1% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -199.8% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.88x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $284M | -$1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $471M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $755M | $338M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1559.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PANW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PANW five years ago would be worth $34,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,069 for NTSK. Over the past 12 months, PANW leads with a +4.5% total return vs NTSK's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PANW at 27.1% vs NTSK's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.3% | +4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +105.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +244.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +746.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | +27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
PANW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PANW is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTSK's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PANW currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs NTSK's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.99 | $223.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.67 | $139.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.7% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NTSK as "Buy" and PANW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.7% upside for NTSK (target: $20) vs 5.8% for PANW (target: $208).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.80 | $207.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
PANW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
NTSK vs PANW: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTSK or PANW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netskope, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (NTSK) is the stronger pick with 31. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) offers the better valuation at 122. 8x trailing P/E (53. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NTSK or PANW?
Over the past 5 years, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) delivered a total return of +244. 4%, compared to -49. 3% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PANW returned +746. 7% versus NTSK's -49. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NTSK or PANW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 2. 10β — meaning NTSK is approximately 106% more volatile than PANW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NTSK or PANW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netskope, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (NTSK) is pulling ahead at 31. 7% versus 14. 9% for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. grew EPS -56. 0% year-over-year, compared to -69. 1% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NTSK or PANW?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -95. 8% for Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PANW leads at 13. 5% versus -92. 0% for NTSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PANW leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NTSK or PANW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTSK: 73.
7% to $19. 80.
07Which pays a better dividend — NTSK or PANW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NTSK or PANW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +746. 7% 10Y return). Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PANW: +746. 7%, NTSK: -49. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NTSK and PANW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; PANW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.