Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2M | $2.09B | $4.25B | $2.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $550M | $713M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-71M | $63M | $206M | $-547M |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 99.2% | 70.8% | -7.6% |
| Operating Margin | -239.8% | 26.9% | 44.4% | -21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.5x | 14.8x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $480M | $368M | $383M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $242M | $277M | $289M |
NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) | 100 | 111.3 | +11.3% |
| Hamilton Lane Incor… (HLNE) | 100 | 162.5 | +62.5% |
| StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) | 100 | 162.1 | +62.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NUKK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GCMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 2.34x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.89 vs NUKK's 2.26
HLNE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 464.7% 10Y total return vs STEP's 136.6%
- PEG 0.72 vs GCMG's 1.44
- Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.68x
- 30.5% margin vs NUKK's -144.1%
STEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 65.1%, EPS growth -376.9%
- 65.1% NII/revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5%
- +3.9% vs NUKK's -91.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.1% NII/revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.5% margin vs NUKK's -144.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs NUKK's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STEP's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.9% vs NUKK's -91.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.5% ROA vs NUKK's -5.4% |
NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories
STEP leads 1 • GCMG leads 1 • NUKK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STEP and NUKK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. HLNE is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUKK's -144.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $550M | $713M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | $123M | $320M | -$948M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$71M | $63M | $206M | -$547M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $195M | $364M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +99.2% | +70.8% | -7.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +26.9% | +44.4% | -21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -144.1% | +8.2% | +30.5% | -15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.6% | +31.8% | +43.7% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +4.0% | -56.8% | +40.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GCMG and HLNE and STEP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, HLNE trades at a 38% valuation discount to GCMG's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HLNE offers better value at 0.81x vs GCMG's 1.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $2.1B | $4.2B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $2.3B | $4.3B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 26.57x | 16.44x | -21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.54x | 14.77x | 25.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.44x | 0.81x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.28x | 13.31x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 3.79x | 5.96x | 1.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.28x | 4.60x | 2.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.91x | 13.64x | 35.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLNE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCMG delivers a 107.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $108 in annual profit, vs $-10 for STEP. STEP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCMG's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLNE scores 7/9 vs STEP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +107.6% | +15.6% | -9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +8.9% | +9.5% | -10.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +22.1% | +21.2% | -8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +24.3% | +26.2% | -10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.77x | 0.40x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $238M | $91M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,678 | $242M | $277M | $289M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $480M | $368M | $383M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -76.40x | 13.83x | 25.57x | -126.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STEP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STEP five years ago would be worth $17,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for NUKK. Over the past 12 months, STEP leads with a +3.9% total return vs NUKK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STEP at 38.3% vs NUKK's -72.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.1% | -0.2% | -34.5% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.5% | -8.0% | -42.6% | +3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +60.5% | +42.4% | +164.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -0.8% | +7.1% | +78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +36.9% | +464.7% | +136.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.9% | +17.1% | +12.5% | +38.3% |
Risk & Volatility
GCMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GCMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUKK's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GCMG currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs NUKK's 4.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 0.89x | 1.25x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.21 | $13.22 | $179.19 | $77.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.20 | $9.30 | $86.47 | $40.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.8% | +84.4% | +49.6% | +69.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.5 | 65.2 | 37.3 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 538K | 843K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HLNE and STEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GCMG as "Buy", HLNE as "Buy", STEP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 115.1% upside for GCMG (target: $24) vs 33.8% for STEP (target: $73). For income investors, HLNE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.82% vs GCMG's 1.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.00 | $171.50 | $72.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +2.8% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | $2.51 | $1.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +6.0% | 0.0% |
HLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STEP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NUKK vs GCMG vs HLNE vs STEP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) is the stronger pick with 65. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP?
On trailing P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the cheapest at 16.
4x versus GCM Grosvenor Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, GCM Grosvenor Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP?
Over the past 5 years, StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to -97. 8% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLNE returned +464. 7% versus NUKK's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCM Grosvenor Inc.
(GCMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Nukkleus Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning NUKK is approximately 153% more volatile than GCMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 4% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), StepStone Group Inc.
(STEP) is pulling ahead at 65. 1% versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GCM Grosvenor Inc. grew EPS 1124% year-over-year, compared to -376. 9% for StepStone Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP?
Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
5% net margin versus -144. 1% for Nukkleus Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLNE leads at 44. 4% versus -239. 8% for NUKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GCMG leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GCM Grosvenor Inc.
(GCMG) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for StepStone Group Inc. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GCMG: 115. 1% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP?
In this comparison, HLNE (2.
8% yield), STEP (2. 0% yield), GCMG (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NUKK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NUKK or GCMG or HLNE or STEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GCM Grosvenor Inc.
(GCMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 1. 2% yield). Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GCMG: +36. 9%, NUKK: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NUKK and GCMG and HLNE and STEP?
These companies operate in different sectors (NUKK (Technology) and GCMG (Financial Services) and HLNE (Financial Services) and STEP (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NUKK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GCMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; STEP is a small-cap high-growth stock. GCMG, HLNE, STEP pay a dividend while NUKK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 32%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.