Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $2M | $3.72B | $1.92B | $469M | $84.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $1.54B | $674M | $307M | $20.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $139M | $-173M | $-28M | $2.89B |
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 48.7% | 75.2% | 53.7% | 69.0% |
| Operating Margin | -134.3% | 12.2% | -27.2% | -9.4% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.1x | — | — | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $328K | $898M | $290M | $0.00 | $12.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $449M | $103M | $56M | $2.04B |
NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuwellis, Inc. (NUWE) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
| Boston Scientific C… (BSX) | 100 | 142.0 | +42.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NUWE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MMSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 214.6% 10Y total return vs BSX's 155.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.34x
- Lower P/E (15.1x vs 16.0x)
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ANGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +28.5% vs NUWE's -97.2%
BSX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.34
- Rev growth 19.9%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 19.9% revenue growth vs NUWE's -5.4%
- 14.4% margin vs NUWE's -211.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% revenue growth vs NUWE's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs NUWE's -211.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs NUWE's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs NUWE's -231.2%, ROIC 8.8% vs -433.0% |
NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MMSI leads 1 • ANGO leads 1 • NUWE leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSX is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.1B annually — 2427.4x NUWE's $8M. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUWE's -2.1%. On growth, BSX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $1.5B | $674M | $307M | $20.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $290M | -$165M | -$5M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $139M | -$173M | -$28M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $274M | -$48M | -$9M | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.0% | +48.7% | +75.2% | +53.7% | +69.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -134.3% | +12.2% | -27.2% | -9.4% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +9.0% | -25.7% | -9.0% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -131.8% | +17.8% | -7.1% | -3.0% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +7.8% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +15.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | +38.8% | -100.0% | +42.3% | +18.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.2x trailing earnings, BSX trades at a 0% valuation discount to MMSI's 29.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MMSI's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSX's 25.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $3.7B | $1.9B | $469M | $84.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $4.2B | $2.1B | $413M | $94.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 29.26x | -13.80x | -13.58x | 29.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.05x | — | — | 15.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.06x | — | — | 25.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 2.45x | 2.92x | 1.60x | 4.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.89x | 2.38x | 5.51x | 2.52x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.24x | — | — | 22.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSX delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-60 for NUWE. NUWE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs NUWE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.5% | +8.9% | -50.8% | -15.7% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +5.2% | -16.5% | -10.3% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.3% | +7.2% | -16.4% | -22.9% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +7.9% | -28.9% | -18.6% | +11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.57x | 0.85x | — | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$757,000 | $450M | $187M | -$56M | $10.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $449M | $103M | $56M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $328,000 | $898M | $290M | $0 | $12.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.75x | 10.74x | -96.80x | -258.19x | 11.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $13,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NUWE. Over the past 12 months, ANGO leads with a +28.5% total return vs NUWE's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANGO at 7.9% vs NUWE's -94.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.2% | -27.9% | +28.3% | -11.1% | -40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | -33.8% | +1.1% | +28.5% | -46.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -26.5% | -75.7% | +25.8% | +6.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -3.6% | -91.3% | -53.3% | +31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +214.6% | +30.3% | -9.2% | +155.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.5% | -9.8% | -37.6% | +7.9% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs NUWE's 2.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.66x | 2.15x | 1.26x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.26 | $100.19 | $20.06 | $13.99 | $109.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $59.74 | $9.82 | $8.36 | $54.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.5% | +62.2% | +83.9% | +80.6% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 34.9 | 69.8 | 54.0 | 33.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 769K | 1.5M | 395K | 15.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MMSI as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ANGO as "Hold", BSX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 46.4% for ANGO (target: $17).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 | $33.50 | $16.50 | $91.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 15 | 11 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
BSX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MMSI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NUWE vs MMSI vs NVCR vs ANGO vs BSX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger pick with 19.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Nuwellis, Inc. (NUWE). Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX?
On trailing P/E, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the cheapest at 29.
2x versus Merit Medical Systems, Inc. at 29. 3x. On forward P/E, Merit Medical Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX?
Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +31.
2%, compared to -100. 0% for Nuwellis, Inc. (NUWE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +209. 3% versus NUWE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 616% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuwellis, Inc. (NUWE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is pulling ahead at 19.
9% versus -5. 4% for Nuwellis, Inc. (NUWE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -217. 4% for Nuwellis, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BSX leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX?
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus -211. 8% for Nuwellis, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus -134. 3% for NUWE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Boston Scientific Corporation — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NUWE or MMSI or NVCR or ANGO or BSX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), +143. 6% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSX: +143. 6%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NUWE and MMSI and NVCR and ANGO and BSX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NUWE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.