Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NVA vs GLDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
NVA vs GLDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Gold |
| Market Cap | $31M | $250M |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-15M |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $387K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $12M |
NVA vs GLDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nova Minerals Limit… (NVA) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) | 100 | 133.1 | +33.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVA vs GLDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 60.2% 10Y total return vs GLDG's 6.3%
- +150.6% vs GLDG's +48.9%
GLDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.36
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 3.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 0.5% margin vs NVA's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs NVA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +150.6% vs GLDG's +48.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.3% ROA vs NVA's -8.7% |
NVA vs GLDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | — | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +104.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NVA and GLDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $250M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $241M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.86x | -12.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 2.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLDG delivers a -8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-9 for NVA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVA scores 3/9 vs GLDG's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.9% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.2% | -20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$11M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $387,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.50x | -113.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVA leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, NVA leads with a +150.6% total return vs GLDG's +48.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | -4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +150.6% | +48.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +11.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -26.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.2% | +6.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GLDG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLDG is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLDG currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs NVA's 39.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.28 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.68 | $0.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.6% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 480K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NVA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GLDG leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
NVA vs GLDG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVA or GLDG a better buy right now?
Analysts rate GoldMining Inc.
(GLDG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NVA or GLDG?
Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVA returned +60.
2% versus GLDG's +6. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NVA or GLDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GoldMining Inc.
(GLDG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Nova Minerals Limited's 1. 73β — meaning NVA is approximately 27% more volatile than GLDG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — NVA or GLDG?
Nova Minerals Limited (NVA) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for GoldMining Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for GLDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — NVA or GLDG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is NVA or GLDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GoldMining Inc.
(GLDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Nova Minerals Limited (NVA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLDG: +6. 3%, NVA: +60. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between NVA and GLDG?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.