NVA vs USAS vs GLDG vs NEM vs AEM

For growth investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger pick with 43.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.

7x versus Agnico Eagle Mines Limited at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited wins at 0. 40x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) delivered a total return of +183.

3%, compared to -26. 1% for GoldMining Inc. (GLDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEM returned +351. 2% versus USAS's -5. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

52β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 340% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 45% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is pulling ahead at 43.

7% versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited grew EPS 134. 4% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, USAS leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

5% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLDG: 135. 3% to $2. 80.

In this comparison, NEM (0.

9% yield), AEM (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NVA, USAS, GLDG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

52), 0. 8% yield, +351. 2% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +351. 2%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLDG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEM, AEM pay a dividend while NVA, USAS, GLDG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.