Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NVGS vs FLNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
NVGS vs FLNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.48B | $1.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $587M | $348M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $100M | $75M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 52.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 50.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.0x | 18.4x |
| Total Debt | $903M | $1.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $448M |
NVGS vs FLNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navigator Holdings … (NVGS) | 100 | 323.7 | +223.7% |
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 694.3 | +594.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVGS vs FLNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 23.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- PEG 0.09 vs FLNG's 0.33
- 3.6% revenue growth vs FLNG's -2.4%
FLNG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 9.4%
- 238.4% 10Y total return vs NVGS's 56.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 3.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs FLNG's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 18.4x), PEG 0.09 vs 0.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs NVGS's 17.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs NVGS's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 9.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NVGS's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.4% vs FLNG's +46.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs FLNG's 2.9%, ROIC 5.7% vs 6.1% |
NVGS vs FLNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NVGS vs FLNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $587M annually — 1.7x FLNG's $348M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.5% (FLNG) to 17.1% (NVGS). On growth, NVGS holds the edge at +6.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $587M | $348M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $282M | $252M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $100M | $75M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +52.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +50.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +21.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +38.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | -52.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NVGS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, NVGS trades at a 33% valuation discount to FLNG's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVGS offers better value at 0.09x vs FLNG's 0.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.41x | 23.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.99x | 18.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.09x | 0.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.92x | 12.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.52x | 4.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.44x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVGS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLNG delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for NVGS. NVGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNG's 2.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVGS scores 6/9 vs FLNG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 2.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $698M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $448M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $903M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.04x | 1.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NVGS and FLNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLNG five years ago would be worth $39,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,503 for NVGS. Over the past 12 months, NVGS leads with a +76.4% total return vs FLNG's +46.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVGS at 21.8% vs FLNG's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.0% | +32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.4% | +46.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.5% | +26.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.0% | +290.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.5% | +238.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.8% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVGS and FLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVGS's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.22 | $33.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.91 | $21.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.5 | 72.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
FLNG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NVGS as "Buy" and FLNG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.5% upside for NVGS (target: $23) vs -24.9% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, FLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.39% vs NVGS's 0.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +9.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.22 | $3.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.2% | 0.0% |
FLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). NVGS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
NVGS vs FLNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVGS or FLNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG). Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVGS or FLNG?
On trailing P/E, Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Navigator Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Navigator Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVGS or FLNG?
Over the past 5 years, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) delivered a total return of +290. 7%, compared to +105. 0% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNG returned +238. 4% versus NVGS's +56. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVGS or FLNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Navigator Holdings Ltd. 's 0. 63β — meaning NVGS is approximately 313% more volatile than FLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 72% versus 3% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVGS or FLNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -2. 4% for FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navigator Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 23. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 7% for FLEX LNG Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVGS leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVGS or FLNG?
FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus 17. 1% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus 23. 9% for NVGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLNG leads at 52. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVGS or FLNG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 4x for FLEX LNG Ltd. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVGS: 1. 5% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVGS or FLNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) offers the highest yield at 9. 4%, versus 1. 0% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS).
09Is NVGS or FLNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 9. 4% yield, +238. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +238. 4%, NVGS: +56. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVGS and FLNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVGS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.