Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Chemicals - Specialty
Telecommunications Services
NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Chemicals - Specialty | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $150M | $70M | $611M | $1.15B | $156M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $162M | $428M | $1.94B | $285M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-114M | $-7M | $-29M | $-15M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | -255.3% | 10.8% | 28.6% | 1.8% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | -10.5% | 1.6% | 1.2% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.0x | 31.5x | 46.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $70M | $30M | $186M | $508M | $307M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $7M | $105M | $182M | $19M |
NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novonix Limited (NVX) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT) | 100 | 60.9 | -39.1% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 50.3 | -49.7% |
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 35.5 | -64.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CBAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.05
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 25.1%, current ratio 0.82x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.05 vs MVST's 2.45, lower leverage
MVST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- 12.6% revenue growth vs NVX's -51.8%
GPRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 21.3% 10Y total return vs KORE's -9.8%
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 1.79x
- -0.8% margin vs NVX's -8.8%
- +336.6% vs NVX's -39.1%
Among these 5 stocks, KORE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs NVX's -51.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.8% margin vs NVX's -8.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs MVST's 2.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +336.6% vs NVX's -39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.0% ROA vs NVX's -47.6%, ROIC -5.2% vs -25.6% |
NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBAT leads in 2 of 6 categories
KORE leads 1 • NVX leads 0 • MVST leads 0 • GPRE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MVST and GPRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 149.2x NVX's $13M. GPRE is the more profitable business, keeping -0.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVX's -8.8%. On growth, CBAT holds the edge at +36.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $162M | $428M | $1.9B | $285M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$86M | -$8M | $32M | $122M | $44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$114M | -$7M | -$29M | -$15M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$120M | -$8M | $56M | $90M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +10.8% | +28.6% | +1.8% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | -10.5% | +1.6% | +1.2% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | -4.0% | -6.8% | -0.8% | -24.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | -5.1% | +13.1% | +4.7% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +36.5% | -15.0% | -25.9% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.9% | — | +119.2% | +134.2% | +36.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CBAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 103.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $150M | $70M | $611M | $1.1B | $156M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $94M | $692M | $1.5B | $444M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.17x | 6.04x | -21.00x | -9.14x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 31.50x | 46.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.22x | 99.04x | 103.82x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 25.70x | 0.40x | 1.43x | 0.55x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 0.59x | 1.49x | 1.44x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.13x | 10.89x | 17.84x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPRE delivers a -2.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-82 for NVX. CBAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPRE's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs NVX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -81.6% | -5.5% | -7.4% | -2.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.6% | -2.0% | -2.9% | -1.0% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.6% | +4.6% | +0.9% | -5.2% | -30.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.7% | +7.0% | +1.2% | -6.2% | -22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.25x | 0.45x | 0.66x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $23M | $81M | $326M | $288M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $7M | $105M | $182M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $30M | $186M | $508M | $307M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.52x | -24.86x | -16.53x | -0.08x | -1.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MVST and GPRE and KORE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KORE five years ago would be worth $9,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $315 for NVX. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +336.6% total return vs NVX's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 16.7% vs NVX's -36.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.8% | -8.7% | -33.0% | +60.1% | +105.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.1% | -6.9% | -2.1% | +336.6% | +266.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | +2.0% | +58.8% | -46.8% | +57.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -81.0% | -84.4% | -48.5% | -7.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | -69.9% | -80.7% | +21.3% | -9.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.3% | +0.7% | +16.7% | -19.0% | +16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
KORE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KORE is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MVST's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NVX's 18.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 1.05x | 2.45x | 1.22x | -0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.86 | $1.25 | $7.12 | $18.94 | $9.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $0.77 | $1.37 | $3.39 | $2.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.1% | +62.8% | +26.5% | +86.9% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 39.6 | 54.4 | 54.3 | 74.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 354K | 111K | 3.9M | 1.5M | 137K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NVX and CBAT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MVST as "Buy", GPRE as "Buy", KORE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 154.0% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs -16.2% for GPRE (target: $14).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $4.80 | $13.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 6 | 20 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.6% | +0.3% |
CBAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KORE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
NVX vs CBAT vs MVST vs GPRE vs KORE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 8% for Novonix Limited (NVX). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE?
On forward P/E, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE?
Over the past 5 years, KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) delivered a total return of -7. 4%, compared to -96. 9% for Novonix Limited (NVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPRE returned +21. 3% versus NVX's -96. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus Microvast Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning MVST is approximately -2835% more volatile than KORE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 66% for Green Plains Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus -51. 8% for Novonix Limited (NVX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to -39. 5% for Green Plains Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBAT leads at 49. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -1278. 0% for Novonix Limited — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAT leads at 5. 0% versus -880. 0% for NVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVX leads at 69. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) trades at 31. 5x forward P/E versus 46. 6x for Green Plains Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 154. 0% to $4. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NVX or CBAT or MVST or GPRE or KORE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 09)). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KORE: -9. 8%, MVST: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVX and CBAT and MVST and GPRE and KORE?
These companies operate in different sectors (NVX (Industrials) and CBAT (Industrials) and MVST (Industrials) and GPRE (Basic Materials) and KORE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.