NWS vs FOXA

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWS). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWS) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus News Corporation at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +70.

4%, compared to +25. 5% for News Corporation (NWS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWS returned +158. 3% versus FOXA's +30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

54β versus News Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning NWS is approximately 8% more volatile than FOXA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 60% for Fox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 72. 3% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

9% net margin versus 5. 5% for News Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 16. 7% for NWS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWS leads at 56. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOXA) trades at 13.

5x forward P/E versus 29. 4x for News Corporation — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

News Corporation (NWS) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Fox Corporation (FOXA).

For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

58), 1. 1% yield, +158. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWS: +158. 3%, FOXA: +30. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NWS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.