NXE
NexGen Energy Ltd.
Uranium
Market Cap$8.43B
5Y Perf.+820.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NXE vs CCJ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
Uranium
Market Cap$53.89B
5Y Perf.+1038.5%
NXE vs CCJ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NXE | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Uranium | Uranium |
| Market Cap | $8.43B | $53.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-310M | $589M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 77.2x |
| Total Debt | $586M | $1.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $802M | $1.11B |
NXE vs CCJ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NXE
CCJ
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) | 100 | 920.0 | +820.0% |
| Cameco Corporation (CCJ) | 100 | 1138.5 | +1038.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXE vs CCJ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CCJ leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. NexGen Energy Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NXE
NexGen Energy Ltd.
The Income Pick
NXE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.48
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 1.82x
- Beta 1.48, current ratio 1.82x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
The Growth Play
CCJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 246.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs NXE's 5.7%
- 10.9% revenue growth vs NXE's -308.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CCJ | 10.9% revenue growth vs NXE's -308.3% |
| Quality / Margins | CCJ | 16.9% margin vs NXE's -1.2% |
| Stability / Safety | NXE | Beta 1.48 vs CCJ's 1.72 |
| Dividends | CCJ | 0.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CCJ | +157.4% vs NXE's +139.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CCJ | 6.0% ROA vs NXE's -17.3%, ROIC 6.3% vs -4.9% |
NXE vs CCJ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCCJLAGGINGNXE
NXENexGen Energy Ltd.
2leads
CCJCameco Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NXEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CCJ1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NXE2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CCJ7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CCJ5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NXE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCJ and NXE operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | CCJCameco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$87M | $912M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$310M | $589M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$183M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +45.2% |
CCJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
NXE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | CCJCameco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.4B | $53.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $53.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.65x | 124.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 77.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 82.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 21.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.62x | 10.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 71.65x |
NXE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCJ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCJ delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-25 for NXE. CCJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXE's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCJ scores 8/9 vs NXE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | CCJCameco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.3% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$215M | -$92M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $802M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $586M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.43x | 10.04x |
CCJ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCJ five years ago would be worth $68,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,000 for NXE. Over the past 12 months, CCJ leads with a +157.4% total return vs NXE's +139.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCJ at 65.3% vs NXE's 48.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | CCJCameco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.7% | +25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +139.0% | +157.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.7% | +351.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +180.0% | +584.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +569.1% | +975.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.5% | +65.3% |
CCJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXE is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCJ's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | CCJCameco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.96 | $135.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.16 | $45.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 3.2M |
NXE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NXE as "Buy" and CCJ as "Buy". CCJ is the only dividend payer here at 0.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | CCJCameco Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $125.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CCJ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NXE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallCameco Corporation (CCJ)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NXE vs CCJ: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXE or CCJ a better buy right now?
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) offers the better valuation at 124.
6x trailing P/E (77. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NXE or CCJ?
Over the past 5 years, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) delivered a total return of +584.
4%, compared to +180. 0% for NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCJ returned +975. 9% versus NXE's +569. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NXE or CCJ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NexGen Energy Ltd.
(NXE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Cameco Corporation's 1. 72β — meaning CCJ is approximately 16% more volatile than NXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 32% for NexGen Energy Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NXE or CCJ?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cameco Corporation grew EPS 246.
2% year-over-year, compared to -271. 4% for NexGen Energy Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NXE or CCJ?
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
9% net margin versus 0. 0% for NexGen Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCJ leads at 16. 7% versus 0. 0% for NXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCJ leads at 26. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NXE or CCJ?
In this comparison, CCJ (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. NXE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NXE or CCJ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+975.
9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCJ: +975. 9%, NXE: +569. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NXE and CCJ?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.