NXE
NexGen Energy Ltd.
Uranium
Market Cap$8.18B
5Y Perf.+59.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
Renewable Utilities
Market Cap$281.02B
5Y Perf.+664.7%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
Uranium
Market Cap$51.67B
5Y Perf.+173.9%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.-21.5%
NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NXE | GEV | CCJ | MHK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Uranium | Renewable Utilities | Uranium | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $8.18B | $281.02B | $51.67B | $6.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $39.38B | $3.48B | $10.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-415M | $9.38B | $589M | $414M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.9% | 29.4% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.9% | 17.5% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.6x | 74.0x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $586M | $0.00 | $1.02B | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $802M | $8.85B | $1.11B | $856M |
NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NXE
GEV
CCJ
MHK
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) | 100 | 159.3 | +59.3% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| Cameco Corporation (CCJ) | 100 | 273.9 | +173.9% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GEV leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Cameco Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. MHK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NXE
NexGen Energy Ltd.
The Secondary Option
NXE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: energy exposure
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
The Quality Compounder
GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 23.8% margin vs NXE's -1.2%
- +157.4% vs MHK's +1.9%
- 15.2% ROA vs NXE's -20.6%, ROIC 27.9% vs -4.9%
Best for: quality and momentum
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
The Income Pick
CCJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 246.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs GEV's 7.0%
- Beta 1.72, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.47x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 74.0x)
- Beta 1.34 vs GEV's 1.76
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CCJ | 10.9% revenue growth vs NXE's -351.0% |
| Value | MHK | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 74.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | GEV | 23.8% margin vs NXE's -1.2% |
| Stability / Safety | MHK | Beta 1.34 vs GEV's 1.76 |
| Dividends | CCJ | 0.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GEV's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | GEV | +157.4% vs MHK's +1.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GEV | 15.2% ROA vs NXE's -20.6%, ROIC 27.9% vs -4.9% |
NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGEVLAGGINGNXE
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
MHK leads 1 • CCJ leads 1 • NXE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓NXENexGen Energy Ltd.
0leads
MHKMohawk Industries, In…
1leads
CCJCameco Corporation
1leads
GEVGE Vernova Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CCJvs MHKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MHK5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GEV6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GEV5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CCJ2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GEV and CCJ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV and NXE operate at a comparable scale, with $39.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MHK's 3.8%. On growth, GEV holds the edge at +16.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CCJCameco Corporation | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $39.4B | $3.5B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$96M | $2.2B | $912M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$415M | $9.4B | $589M | $414M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$193M | $3.6B | $1.1B | $709M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +19.9% | +29.4% | +24.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +3.9% | +17.5% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +23.8% | +16.9% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.2% | +30.3% | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.1% | +1.4% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -166.7% | +18.2% | +45.2% | +65.2% |
Evenly matched — GEV and CCJ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, MHK trades at a 86% valuation discount to CCJ's 119.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEV's 121.5x.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CCJCameco Corporation | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.2B | $281.0B | $51.7B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.0B | $272.2B | $51.6B | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.48x | 59.12x | 119.93x | 17.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.62x | 74.01x | 11.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 121.45x | 79.53x | 7.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.38x | 20.26x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.43x | 23.47x | 10.22x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.73x | 68.99x | 10.20x |
MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXE. CCJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MHK's 0.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCJ scores 8/9 vs NXE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CCJCameco Corporation | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.3% | +79.7% | +8.8% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | +15.2% | +6.0% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +27.9% | +6.3% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +6.6% | +6.5% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | — | 0.15x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$215M | -$8.8B | -$92M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $802M | $8.8B | $1.1B | $856M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $586M | $0 | $1.0B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.38x | — | 10.04x | 36.90x |
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,472 for MHK. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs MHK's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs MHK's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CCJCameco Corporation | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.8% | +54.0% | +20.4% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.1% | +157.4% | +138.9% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.0% | +698.3% | +333.3% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.9% | +698.3% | +493.6% | -55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +562.0% | +698.3% | +934.7% | -47.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.6% | +99.9% | +63.0% | +0.9% |
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NXE and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHK is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXE currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs MHK's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CCJCameco Corporation | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.76x | 1.72x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.96 | $1181.95 | $135.24 | $143.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.29 | $387.03 | $47.87 | $93.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +88.5% | +87.7% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 66.5 | 56.1 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 2.4M | 3.2M | 1.1M |
Evenly matched — NXE and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CCJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXE as "Buy", GEV as "Buy", CCJ as "Buy", MHK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs 6.1% for CCJ (target: $126). CCJ is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | NXENexGen Energy Ltd. | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CCJCameco Corporation | MHKMohawk Industries… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 | $125.91 | $130.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 28 | 19 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $0.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
CCJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MHK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallGE Vernova Inc. (GEV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NXE vs GEV vs CCJ vs MHK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the stronger pick with 10.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK?
On trailing P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Cameco Corporation at 119. 9x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to -55. 3% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCJ returned +934. 7% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately 31% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 33% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is pulling ahead at 10.
9% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cameco Corporation grew EPS 246. 2% year-over-year, compared to -271. 4% for NexGen Energy Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCJ leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK?
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
9% net margin versus 0. 0% for NexGen Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCJ leads at 16. 7% versus 0. 0% for NXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCJ leads at 26. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 74. 0x for Cameco Corporation — 62. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK?
In this comparison, CCJ (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. NXE, GEV, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXE or GEV or CCJ or MHK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.
7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCJ: +934. 7%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXE and GEV and CCJ and MHK?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXE (Energy) and GEV (Utilities) and CCJ (Energy) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CCJ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.