Asset Management - Income
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NXP vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
NXP vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Income | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $748M | $291.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | 97.2% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 93.9% | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 75.7x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $182.09B |
NXP vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuveen Select Tax-F… (NXP) | 100 | 94.1 | -5.9% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 477.0 | +377.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXP vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.10
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 5.01x
- Beta 0.10, current ratio 5.01x
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 77.3%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs NXP's 33.4%
- 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 75.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs GS's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs GS's 1.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.4% vs NXP's +5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs GS's 0.3% |
NXP vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NXP vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.9B annually — 12483.5x NXP's $10M. NXP is the more profitable business, keeping 93.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GS's 11.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.2% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -118.4% | +45.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, GS trades at a 69% valuation discount to NXP's 75.7x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $748M | $291.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $768M | $726.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 75.68x | 23.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 73.60x | 2.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NXP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for NXP. NXP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 5.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GS scores 4/9 vs NXP's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1462.58x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $27,109 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,119 for NXP. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +73.4% total return vs NXP's +5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 44.0% vs NXP's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.8% | +73.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +198.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +171.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | +536.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +44.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NXP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXP is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.65 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.73 | $547.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 146K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NXP as "Hold" and GS as "Hold". GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
NXP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
NXP vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXP or GS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXP or GS?
On trailing P/E, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio at 75. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXP or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +171. 1%, compared to +1. 2% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +536. 1% versus NXP's +33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXP or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 1363% more volatile than NXP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXP or GS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 77. 3% year-over-year, compared to -70. 8% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXP or GS?
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the more profitable company, earning 93.
9% net margin versus 11. 3% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 93. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXP leads at 93. 9% versus 14. 5% for GS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXP leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NXP or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. NXP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NXP or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXP: +33. 4%, GS: +536. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NXP and GS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while NXP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GS vs MS
MS is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GS.
Compare NXP vs MS
Compare NXP against another closely matched public peer instead of a generic same-sector name.
Expand With MS + JPM
MS and JPM are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.