Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $73.30B | $259.70B | $49.68B | $39.42B | $54.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.61B | $18.44B | $12.40B | $6.06B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.65B | $5.37B | $145M | $574M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 54.9% | 57.3% | 33.8% | 37.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.8% | 35.3% | 3.5% | 10.8% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | 37.8x | 47.1x | 34.4x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $12.22B | $15.39B | $2.13B | $3.47B | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.27B | $3.23B | $2.84B | $2.15B | $772M |
NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NXP Semiconductors … (NXPI) | 100 | 302.1 | +202.1% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 240.2 | +140.2% |
| STMicroelectronics … (STM) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (19.8x vs 64.8x)
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 94.6%, current ratio 4.35x
- Beta 1.11, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
STM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs TXN's 471.6%
- +159.2% vs NXPI's +57.5%
Among these 5 stocks, MCHP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 64.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs STM's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs NXPI's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.2% vs NXPI's +57.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.8% |
NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ON leads 1 • NXPI leads 0 • STM leads 0 • MCHP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 4.2x MCHP's $4.4B. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, STM holds the edge at +22.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.6B | $18.4B | $12.4B | $6.1B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.7B | $8.1B | $2.3B | $1.2B | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $5.4B | $145M | $574M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | $3.7B | $160M | $1.5B | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.9% | +57.3% | +33.8% | +37.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +35.3% | +3.5% | +10.8% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +29.1% | +1.2% | +9.5% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +20.2% | +1.3% | +24.0% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +18.6% | +22.8% | +4.7% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.7% | +32.0% | -33.3% | +93.0% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXPI and STM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.5x trailing earnings, NXPI trades at a 89% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NXPI's 19.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STM's 122.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73.3B | $259.7B | $49.7B | $39.4B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82.3B | $271.9B | $49.0B | $40.7B | $59.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.52x | 52.34x | 310.56x | 346.84x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.82x | 37.76x | 47.13x | 34.37x | 64.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.32x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.86x | 33.89x | 122.07x | 28.42x | 57.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.97x | 14.69x | 4.20x | 6.57x | 12.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.07x | 16.00x | 2.83x | 5.38x | 7.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.25x | 99.77x | — | 27.79x | 71.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. STM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXPI's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXN scores 7/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.2% | +32.5% | +0.8% | +7.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | +15.5% | +0.6% | +4.5% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +15.8% | +1.3% | +6.1% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.1% | +19.0% | +1.5% | +6.2% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.17x | 0.95x | 0.12x | 0.45x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.0B | $12.2B | -$704M | $1.3B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.3B | $3.2B | $2.8B | $2.1B | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.2B | $15.4B | $2.1B | $3.5B | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.78x | 12.06x | 28.71x | 10.49x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ON five years ago would be worth $26,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,566 for MCHP. Over the past 12 months, ON leads with a +159.2% total return vs NXPI's +57.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXN at 22.4% vs ON's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.7% | +62.3% | +104.6% | +77.4% | +56.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.5% | +76.5% | +144.0% | +159.2% | +115.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.0% | +83.5% | +32.9% | +24.9% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.9% | +65.5% | +53.8% | +160.4% | +45.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +267.4% | +471.6% | +981.9% | +1004.1% | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +22.4% | +10.0% | +7.7% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXN and MCHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STM's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs ON's 95.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.11x | 2.05x | 1.95x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $303.88 | $292.64 | $58.01 | $105.88 | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $182.42 | $152.73 | $21.11 | $37.56 | $46.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +97.5% | +96.4% | +95.0% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.9 | 79.6 | 87.3 | 81.5 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 6.7M | 9.8M | 9.2M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXPI as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", STM as "Buy", ON as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for STM (target: $58) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.92% vs STM's 0.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $242.60 | $253.71 | $57.50 | $62.40 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 65 | 29 | 45 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.9% | +0.6% | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.03 | $5.48 | $0.35 | — | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.6% | +0.7% | +3.5% | +0.2% |
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ON leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NXPI vs TXN vs STM vs ON vs MCHP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). NXP Semiconductors N. V. (NXPI) offers the better valuation at 36. 5x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NXP Semiconductors N. V. (NXPI) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP?
On trailing P/E, NXP Semiconductors N.
V. (NXPI) is the cheapest at 36. 5x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, NXP Semiconductors N. V. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) delivered a total return of +160.
4%, compared to +45. 7% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1004% versus NXPI's +267. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
11β versus STMicroelectronics N. V. 's 2. 05β — meaning STM is approximately 85% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, STMicroelectronics N. V. (STM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 117% for NXP Semiconductors N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Instruments Incorporated grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NXPI leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP?
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
3% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 2. 7% for STM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NXP Semiconductors N.
V. (NXPI) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 45. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STM: 2. 9% to $57. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), MCHP (1. 8% yield), NXPI (1. 4% yield), STM (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXPI or TXN or STM or ON or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, ON: +1004%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXPI and TXN and STM and ON and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NXPI, TXN, STM, MCHP pay a dividend while ON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.