NXTT
Next Technology Holding Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$13K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-93.3%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-38.8%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$136M
5Y Perf.+143.7%
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-57.7%
NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NXTT | RCON | CLPS | CODA | HIHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $13K | $17M | $25M | $136M | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $66M | $299M | $28M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-156M | $-43M | $-4M | $4M | $-535K |
| Gross Margin | 15.2% | 23.0% | 22.8% | 66.3% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | -86.5% | -1.4% | 17.4% | -21.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | — | — | 22.8x | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $34M | $34M | $395K | $810K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $99M | $28M | $29M | $6M |
NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NXTT
RCON
CLPS
CODA
HIHO
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Technology Hol… (NXTT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 6.7 | -93.3% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 243.7 | +143.7% |
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CODA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Next Technology Holding Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CLPS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NXTT
Next Technology Holding Inc.
The Growth Play
NXTT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.3%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 32.5x)
Best for: growth exposure
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick
CLPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
- Beta 0.19, yield 14.7%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.19 vs NXTT's 2.61
- 14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HIHO's 14.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs HIHO's -41.3%
- 14.8% margin vs NXTT's -12.9%
- +78.9% vs NXTT's -97.6%
- 6.6% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 11.2% vs -22.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, HIHO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NXTT | 5.5% revenue growth vs RCON's -3.7% |
| Value | NXTT | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 32.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | CODA | 14.8% margin vs NXTT's -12.9% |
| Stability / Safety | CLPS | Beta 0.19 vs NXTT's 2.61 |
| Dividends | CLPS | 14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HIHO's 14.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | CODA | +78.9% vs NXTT's -97.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CODA | 6.6% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 11.2% vs -22.5% |
NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2023
NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGHIHO
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
NXTT leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • RCON leads 0 • HIHO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓HIHOHighway Holdings Limi…
0leads
RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
1leads
NXTTNext Technology Holdi…
1leads
CODACoda Octopus Group, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NXTTvs CLPSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CODA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NXTT3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CODA6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CODA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CLPS2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 48.7x HIHO's $6M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXTT's -12.9%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NXTTNext Technology H… | RCONRecon Technology,… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | HIHOHighway Holdings … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $66M | $299M | $28M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$86M | -$54M | -$1M | $6M | -$653,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$156M | -$43M | -$4M | $4M | -$535,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145M | -$44M | $0 | $7M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +23.0% | +22.8% | +66.3% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | -86.5% | -1.4% | +17.4% | -21.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | -64.3% | -1.3% | +14.8% | -8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | -65.9% | -2.3% | +24.6% | -6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.6% | +15.3% | +28.8% | -44.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +35.7% | +75.8% | +3.0% | -2.5% |
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NXTT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, NXTT trades at a 100% valuation discount to CODA's 32.7x P/E.
| Metric | NXTTNext Technology H… | RCONRecon Technology,… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | HIHOHighway Holdings … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13,212 | $17M | $25M | $136M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $7M | $31M | $108M | -$2M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -1.21x | -3.46x | 32.73x | 32.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 22.85x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — | — | 7.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 18.25x | -23.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.70x | 0.15x | 5.14x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.11x | 0.43x | 2.34x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 22.60x | — |
NXTT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXTT. NXTT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NXTTNext Technology H… | RCONRecon Technology,… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | HIHOHighway Holdings … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.0% | -9.2% | -6.1% | +7.2% | -9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.2% | -8.0% | -3.2% | +6.6% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.5% | -10.6% | -7.9% | +11.2% | -31.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.3% | -11.8% | -9.8% | +8.1% | -7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.08x | 0.59x | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$64M | $6M | -$28M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $99M | $28M | $29M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $34M | $34M | $394,932 | $810,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -372.30x | — | — | — |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NXTT. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs NXTT's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 11.0% vs NXTT's -91.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NXTTNext Technology H… | RCONRecon Technology,… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | HIHOHighway Holdings … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -78.2% | -46.4% | -10.9% | +27.3% | -42.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.6% | -53.4% | -9.4% | +78.9% | -56.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -88.8% | +0.0% | +36.8% | -46.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.4% | -69.2% | +55.9% | -57.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.3% | -78.6% | +861.1% | -41.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -91.3% | -51.8% | +0.0% | +11.0% | -18.6% |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXTT's 2.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 70.1% from its 52-week high vs NXTT's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NXTTNext Technology H… | RCONRecon Technology,… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | HIHOHighway Holdings … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.61x | 0.49x | 0.19x | 0.99x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $960.00 | $7.16 | $1.88 | $17.28 | $2.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $0.75 | $0.80 | $5.98 | $0.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +11.6% | +47.9% | +70.1% | +35.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 38.3 | 46.8 | 48.3 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 91K | 15K | 255K | 60K |
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.69% vs HIHO's 14.27%.
| Metric | NXTTNext Technology H… | RCONRecon Technology,… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | HIHOHighway Holdings … |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.7% | — | +14.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NXTT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NXTT vs RCON vs CLPS vs CODA vs HIHO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the stronger pick with 545. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO?
On trailing P/E, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus NXTT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Next Technology Holding Inc. 's 2. 61β — meaning NXTT is approximately 1238% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is pulling ahead at 545. 3% versus -3. 7% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Next Technology Holding Inc. grew EPS 728. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO?
Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the more profitable company, earning 1233% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 1233% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -690. 5% for NXTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
7% yield), HIHO (14. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NXTT, RCON, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NXTT or RCON or CLPS or CODA or HIHO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 14. 7% yield). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, NXTT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NXTT and RCON and CLPS and CODA and HIHO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXTT (Technology) and RCON (Energy) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and HIHO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXTT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS, HIHO pay a dividend while NXTT, RCON, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NXTT: 545.3% · RCON: 2.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.