Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $52M | $1.23B | $2.02B | $1.14B | $102.97B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $915M | $674M | $1.03B | $35.48B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-86M | $131M | $-173M | $-95M | $4.61B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 85.8% | 75.2% | 54.9% | 61.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 5.6% | -27.2% | -7.9% | 17.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 47.6x | — | — | 13.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $32M | $290M | $444M | $28.52B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $105M | $103M | $91M | $2.22B | $10.27B |
NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nyxoah S.A. (NYXH) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| Inspire Medical Sys… (INSP) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 61.3 | -38.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 153.1 | +53.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NYXH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 121.6% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
INSP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 179.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 6.08x
- 15.2% ROA vs NYXH's -80.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs -76.4%
Among these 6 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TNDM doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 44 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 3.5%
- Beta 0.31, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.85x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.31 vs NVCR's 2.21, lower leverage
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs INSP's 70.9%
- PEG 2.26 vs MDT's 34.25
- 27.8% margin vs NYXH's -5.3%
- +17.2% vs NYXH's -81.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 121.6% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NYXH's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs NVCR's 2.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 44-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs NYXH's -81.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs NYXH's -80.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs -76.4% |
NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
MDT leads 1 • INSP leads 1 • NYXH leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • TNDM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 3020.2x NYXH's $16M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NYXH's -5.3%. On growth, NYXH holds the edge at +5.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $915M | $674M | $1.0B | $35.5B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | $62M | -$165M | -$68M | $9.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$86M | $131M | -$173M | -$95M | $4.6B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$73M | $97M | -$48M | -$4M | $5.4B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +85.8% | +75.2% | +54.9% | +61.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +5.6% | -27.2% | -7.9% | +17.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +14.3% | -25.7% | -9.2% | +13.0% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +10.6% | -7.1% | -0.4% | +15.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +1.6% | +12.3% | +5.5% | +8.8% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | -5.0% | -100.0% | +84.8% | -11.9% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, INSP trades at a 68% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs MDT's 34.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $1.2B | $2.0B | $1.1B | $103.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $1.2B | $2.2B | $1.5B | $129.3B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.51x | 8.73x | -14.57x | -5.46x | 22.22x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 47.59x | — | — | 13.44x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 34.25x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.83x | — | — | 14.66x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.48x | 1.35x | 3.09x | 1.12x | 3.07x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.63x | 5.82x | 7.20x | 2.14x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.68x | — | — | 19.86x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-164 for NYXH. INSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSP scores 7/9 vs NYXH's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -164.4% | +18.0% | -50.8% | -68.3% | +9.5% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -80.8% | +15.2% | -16.5% | -10.0% | +5.0% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -76.4% | +6.0% | -16.4% | -10.0% | +6.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -80.4% | +6.7% | -28.9% | -11.5% | +7.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.04x | 0.85x | 2.86x | 0.59x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$73M | $187M | $354M | $26.3B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $105M | $103M | $91M | $2.2B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $32M | $290M | $444M | $28.5B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.73x | 418.58x | -96.80x | -19.88x | 8.81x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $515 for NYXH. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs NYXH's -81.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs INSP's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.1% | -53.7% | +35.5% | -23.0% | -15.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.6% | -66.8% | -2.3% | -20.7% | -6.2% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.4% | -85.9% | -59.8% | -35.9% | +5.1% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -77.3% | -91.9% | -82.1% | -24.4% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | +70.9% | +62.1% | -77.0% | +21.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.0% | -48.0% | -26.2% | -13.8% | +1.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs NYXH's 16.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.16x | 2.21x | 1.26x | 0.31x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.59 | $147.03 | $18.92 | $29.65 | $106.33 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.26 | $38.91 | $9.82 | $9.98 | $73.31 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.2% | +29.0% | +94.0% | +56.0% | +75.4% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.8 | 43.3 | 57.1 | 43.2 | 53.7 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 189K | 950K | 1.5M | 2.3M | 9.2M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MDT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NYXH as "Buy", INSP as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", MDT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.7% upside for NYXH (target: $6) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.47% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $57.36 | $33.50 | $31.46 | $96.57 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 27 | 15 | 39 | 51 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.5% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 44 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.78 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MDT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NYXH vs INSP vs NVCR vs TNDM vs MDT vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nyxoah S.
A. (NYXH) is the stronger pick with 121. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (47. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nyxoah S. A. (NYXH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO?
On trailing P/E, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
(INSP) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus Medtronic plc's 34. 25x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -94. 9% for Nyxoah S. A. (NYXH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus NYXH's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 21β — meaning NVCR is approximately -1202% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nyxoah S.
A. (NYXH) is pulling ahead at 121. 6% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NYXH leads at 48. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -899. 1% for Nyxoah S. A. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -827. 8% for NYXH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus Medtronic plc's 34. 25x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 47. 6x for Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NYXH: 331. 7% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
5% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NYXH, INSP, NVCR, TNDM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NYXH or INSP or NVCR or TNDM or MDT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Nyxoah S. A. (NYXH) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NYXH: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NYXH and INSP and NVCR and TNDM and MDT and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NYXH (Healthcare) and INSP (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and TNDM (Healthcare) and MDT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NYXH is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MDT, KO pay a dividend while NYXH, INSP, NVCR, TNDM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.