Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OCCI vs FSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
OCCI vs FSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $96M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $254M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 77.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2.3x | 5.4x |
| Total Debt | $114M | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $189M |
OCCI vs FSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFS Credit Company,… (OCCI) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| FS Credit Opportuni… (FSCO) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCCI vs FSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCCI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 117.0%, EPS growth -143.3%
- NIM 13.7% vs FSCO's 8.9%
- 117.0% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4%
FSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 13.9%
- 70.5% 10Y total return vs OCCI's -7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 5.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.0% NII/revenue growth vs FSCO's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 5.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCCI's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs OCCI's 0.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 35.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FSCO's 13.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.4% vs OCCI's -29.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs OCCI's 0.8% |
OCCI vs FSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $254M annually — 6.3x OCCI's $41M. FSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 74.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCCI's -24.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $254M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +77.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.4% | +74.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +85.2% | +26.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | — |
Valuation Metrics
OCCI leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $196M | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | 5.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.27x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.77x | 15.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-6 for OCCI. FSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OCCI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCCI scores 5/9 vs FSCO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $100M | $264M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $189M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $114M | $453M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.95x | 4.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSCO five years ago would be worth $17,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,575 for OCCI. Over the past 12 months, FSCO leads with a -16.4% total return vs OCCI's -29.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSCO at 19.7% vs OCCI's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.0% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.7% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | +71.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.2% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +70.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCCI's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSCO currently trades 67.3% from its 52-week high vs OCCI's 50.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.82 | $7.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.62 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.0% | +67.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.3 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 299K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OCCI and FSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, OCCI offers the higher dividend yield at 35.28% vs FSCO's 13.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +35.3% | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.20 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FSCO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OCCI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OCCI vs FSCO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCCI or FSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, OFS Credit Company, Inc.
(OCCI) is the stronger pick with 117. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OCCI or FSCO?
Over the past 5 years, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) delivered a total return of +70. 5%, compared to -14. 2% for OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSCO returned +70. 5% versus OCCI's -7. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OCCI or FSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus OFS Credit Company, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning OCCI is approximately 0% more volatile than FSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 74% for OFS Credit Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OCCI or FSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), OFS Credit Company, Inc.
(OCCI) is pulling ahead at 117. 0% versus -17. 4% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FS Credit Opportunities Corp. grew EPS -22. 8% year-over-year, compared to -143. 3% for OFS Credit Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OCCI or FSCO?
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 2% net margin versus -24. 4% for OFS Credit Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 74. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSCO leads at 77. 5% versus -5. 5% for OCCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSCO leads at 81. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OCCI or FSCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OFS Credit Company, Inc. (OCCI) offers the highest yield at 35. 3%, versus 13. 9% for FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO).
07Is OCCI or FSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 13. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSCO: +70. 5%, OCCI: -7. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OCCI and FSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OCCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.