Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Household & Personal Products
Business Equipment & Supplies
Packaged Foods
ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Packaged Foods | Household & Personal Products | Business Equipment & Supplies | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $783M | $2.40B | $1.83B | $375M | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $479M | $3.16B | $2.79B | $1.55B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $52M | $171M | $105M | $74M | $200M |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 32.2% | 36.6% | 30.7% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | 8.2% | 4.1% | 7.9% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 13.0x | 15.5x | 4.6x | 30.8x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $1.44B | $654M | $921M | $560M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $882M | $124M | $64M | $278M |
ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oil-Dri Corporation… (ODC) | 100 | 436.1 | +336.1% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ODC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 0.7%
- 386.5% 10Y total return vs FRPT's 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 21.3%, current ratio 2.56x
- PEG 0.95 vs CENT's 4.35
CENT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SPB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 30.8x)
- 7.1% yield, vs SPB's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FRPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 13.0% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
- 17.6% margin vs SPB's 3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 30.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs SPB's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs ACCO's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs SPB's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.7% vs FRPT's -31.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs SPB's 3.0%, ROIC 19.7% vs 3.9% |
ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODC leads in 3 of 6 categories
FRPT leads 1 • ACCO leads 1 • CENT leads 0 • SPB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CENT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 6.6x ODC's $479M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPB's 3.8%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $479M | $3.2B | $2.8B | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $85M | $302M | $214M | $177M | $165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $52M | $171M | $105M | $74M | $200M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $282M | $303M | $49M | $223M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +32.2% | +36.6% | +30.7% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +8.2% | +4.1% | +7.9% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +5.4% | +3.8% | +4.8% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +8.9% | +10.9% | +3.2% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | +8.7% | -3.3% | +8.3% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +30.6% | +48.8% | +2.4% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 56% valuation discount to FRPT's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ODC offers better value at 0.87x vs CENT's 5.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $783M | $2.4B | $1.8B | $375M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $788M | $3.0B | $2.4B | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.14x | 15.11x | 20.37x | 9.23x | 21.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.99x | 13.04x | 15.48x | 4.64x | 30.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.87x | 5.04x | 1.57x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.73x | 8.45x | 10.59x | 6.80x | 16.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 0.77x | 0.65x | 0.25x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.93x | 1.55x | 1.07x | 0.57x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.45x | 8.25x | 11.04x | 7.37x | 221.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODC delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $6 for SPB. ODC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACCO's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ODC scores 9/9 vs FRPT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.7% | +10.7% | +5.5% | +11.3% | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.5% | +4.7% | +3.0% | +3.2% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.7% | +9.1% | +3.9% | +5.5% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.4% | +8.7% | +4.2% | +6.1% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.91x | 0.34x | 1.39x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $558M | $531M | $856M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $882M | $124M | $64M | $278M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $1.4B | $654M | $921M | $560M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.79x | 1200.51x | 3.33x | 2.50x | 13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ODC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ODC five years ago would be worth $44,529 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,165 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, ODC leads with a +70.7% total return vs FRPT's -31.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ODC at 54.8% vs FRPT's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.7% | +20.6% | +31.7% | +12.1% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.7% | +11.8% | +30.1% | +22.8% | -31.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.3% | +30.9% | +14.2% | -4.4% | -17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +345.3% | -17.2% | -7.8% | -39.3% | -68.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +386.5% | +161.6% | +11.9% | -35.1% | +517.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.8% | +9.4% | +4.5% | -1.5% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ODC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ODC is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACCO's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ODC currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs FRPT's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.65x | 0.87x | 1.35x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.75 | $41.30 | $86.95 | $4.29 | $89.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.35 | $28.77 | $49.99 | $2.81 | $46.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +93.3% | +90.4% | +94.6% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 47.2 | 61.3 | 74.3 | 29.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 74K | 318K | 1.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CENT and ACCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CENT as "Buy", SPB as "Buy", ACCO as "Hold", FRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs 11.6% for SPB (target: $88). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs ODC's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 | $87.75 | $8.00 | $77.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 21 | 7 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — | +2.4% | +7.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | — | $1.86 | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +6.5% | +17.8% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
ODC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FRPT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ODC vs CENT vs SPB vs ACCO vs FRPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Oil-Dri Corporation of America wins at 0. 95x versus Central Garden & Pet Company's 4. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT?
Over the past 5 years, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) delivered a total return of +345.
3%, compared to -68. 4% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +486. 5% versus ACCO's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus ACCO Brands Corporation's 1. 35β — meaning ACCO is approximately 289% more volatile than ODC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 139% for ACCO Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -5. 6% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 2. 7% for ACCO Brands Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODC leads at 14. 0% versus 4. 4% for SPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 95x versus Central Garden & Pet Company's 4. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for Freshpet, Inc. — 26. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 97. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT?
In this comparison, ACCO (7.
1% yield), SPB (2. 4% yield), ODC (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CENT, FRPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ODC or CENT or SPB or ACCO or FRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 0. 7% yield, +397. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODC: +397. 0%, ACCO: -35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ODC and CENT and SPB and ACCO and FRPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ODC (Basic Materials) and CENT (Consumer Defensive) and SPB (Consumer Defensive) and ACCO (Industrials) and FRPT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ODC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ODC, SPB, ACCO pay a dividend while CENT, FRPT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.