ODC vs PG

For growth investors, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is the stronger pick with 11.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (21. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is the cheapest at 20.

0x versus The Procter & Gamble Company at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Oil-Dri Corporation of America is actually cheaper at 21. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Oil-Dri Corporation of America wins at 0. 92x versus The Procter & Gamble Company's 3. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) delivered a total return of +352.

9%, compared to +23. 8% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ODC returned +381. 4% versus PG's +121. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

10β versus Oil-Dri Corporation of America's 0. 34β — meaning ODC is approximately 225% more volatile than PG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 68% for The Procter & Gamble Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is pulling ahead at 11.

0% versus 0. 3% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oil-Dri Corporation of America grew EPS 36. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for The Procter & Gamble Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ODC leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

0% net margin versus 10. 6% for Oil-Dri Corporation of America — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PG leads at 24. 3% versus 14. 0% for ODC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PG leads at 51. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus The Procter & Gamble Company's 3. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC) trades at 21. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 4x for The Procter & Gamble Company — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Oil-Dri Corporation of America (ODC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

10), 2. 7% yield, +121. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PG: +121. 5%, ODC: +381. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ODC (Basic Materials) and PG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.