ODV vs AEM

For growth investors, Osisko Development Corp.

(ODV) is the stronger pick with 677. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 43. 7% for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) offers the better valuation at 21. 8x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Osisko Development Corp. (ODV) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) delivered a total return of +194.

1%, compared to -82. 1% for Osisko Development Corp. (ODV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEM returned +363. 7% versus ODV's -54. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus Osisko Development Corp. 's 1. 35β — meaning ODV is approximately 105% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 21% for Osisko Development Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Osisko Development Corp.

(ODV) is pulling ahead at 677. 4% versus 43. 7% for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited grew EPS 134. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Osisko Development Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEM leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

5% net margin versus -476. 4% for Osisko Development Corp. — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus -151. 1% for ODV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, AEM (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. ODV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

66), 0. 7% yield, +363. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +363. 7%, ODV: -54. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

AEM pays a dividend while ODV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.