Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
Silver
Silver
Gold
ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Other Precious Metals | Silver | Silver | Gold |
| Market Cap | $483M | $2.99B | $10.55B | $24.36B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $330M | $1.27B | $4.02B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-169M | $-94M | $174M | $1.27B | $559M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 9.3% | 35.5% | 43.8% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | -261.3% | -1.7% | 29.0% | 37.9% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 20.4x | 12.4x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $144M | $120M | $314M | $935M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $106M | $792M | $1.21B | $242M |
ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Osisko Development … (ODV) | 100 | 10.2 | -89.8% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 235.0 | +135.0% |
| First Majestic Silv… (AG) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
| Pan American Silver… (PAAS) | 100 | 154.7 | +54.7% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 327.7 | +227.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ODV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 6.8% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
EXK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
PAAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.69x
- PEG 0.49 vs AG's 0.78
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.69x
HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs PAAS's 326.1%
- 35.6% margin vs ODV's -476.8%
- +271.0% vs ODV's +68.4%
- 16.3% ROA vs ODV's -16.8%, ROIC 15.3% vs -6.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs ODV's -476.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs EXK's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AG's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs ODV's +68.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs ODV's -16.8%, ROIC 15.3% vs -6.3% |
ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAAS leads in 3 of 6 categories
HL leads 2 • ODV leads 0 • EXK leads 0 • AG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AG and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 113.3x ODV's $35M. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ODV's -4.8%. On growth, AG holds the edge at +171.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $330M | $1.3B | $4.0B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$83M | $49M | $636M | $2.0B | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$169M | -$94M | $174M | $1.3B | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$126M | -$129M | $351M | $1.4B | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +9.3% | +35.5% | +43.8% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -1.7% | +29.0% | +37.9% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -28.4% | +13.7% | +31.7% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -39.1% | +27.7% | +34.0% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +154.0% | +171.8% | +49.2% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -97.5% | +4.8% | +134.8% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PAAS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, PAAS trades at a 64% valuation discount to AG's 61.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAAS offers better value at 0.88x vs AG's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $483M | $3.0B | $10.6B | $24.4B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $539M | $3.0B | $10.1B | $24.1B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.74x | -78.08x | 61.06x | 22.15x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.34x | 20.39x | 12.39x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x | 0.88x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 76.02x | 15.82x | 14.00x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.59x | 13.72x | 8.25x | 6.61x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 5.07x | 3.27x | 3.16x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 30.01x | 22.52x | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-30 for ODV. AG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs ODV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.1% | -18.4% | +5.9% | +19.6% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | -9.2% | +4.1% | +14.0% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +1.5% | +13.1% | +15.7% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.5% | +1.6% | +11.7% | +15.4% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.25x | 0.10x | 0.13x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $76M | $14M | -$478M | -$277M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $106M | $792M | $1.2B | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $144M | $120M | $314M | $935M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.93x | -39.17x | 20.24x | 23.79x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,749 for ODV. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs ODV's +68.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAAS at 48.9% vs ODV's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | +12.5% | +33.1% | +13.6% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.4% | +193.4% | +241.7% | +137.5% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +144.0% | +212.9% | +229.9% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | +61.1% | +31.0% | +71.4% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.8% | +182.7% | +128.5% | +326.1% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.3% | +34.6% | +46.3% | +48.9% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAAS currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.71x | 1.56x | 0.74x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.80 | $15.15 | $32.03 | $69.99 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.74 | $3.14 | $5.49 | $22.08 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.8% | +67.0% | +66.7% | +82.6% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 47.6 | 52.9 | 54.8 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 9.4M | 16.9M | 6.2M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ODV as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", AG as "Hold", PAAS as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27). PAAS is the only dividend payer here at 0.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.75 | $26.50 | $75.00 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 14 | 11 | 24 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.1% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.02 | $0.47 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.0% |
PAAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). HL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ODV vs EXK vs AG vs PAAS vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Osisko Development Corp.
(ODV) is the stronger pick with 677. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Osisko Development Corp. (ODV) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL?
On trailing P/E, Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Pan American Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pan American Silver Corp. wins at 0. 49x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 0. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to -82. 5% for Osisko Development Corp. (ODV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus ODV's -53. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 132% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Osisko Development Corp.
(ODV) is pulling ahead at 677. 4% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAAS leads at 35. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL?
Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -476. 4% for Osisko Development Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -151. 1% for ODV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 0. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL?
In this comparison, PAAS (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ODV, EXK, AG, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ODV or EXK or AG or PAAS or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.
(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +326. 1% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +326. 1%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ODV and EXK and AG and PAAS and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ODV is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAAS pays a dividend while ODV, EXK, AG, HL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.