Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ODV vs VZLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
ODV vs VZLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $479M | $1.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-169M | $-16M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -261.3% | — |
| Total Debt | $144M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $133M |
ODV vs VZLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Osisko Development … (ODV) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 181.2 | +81.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ODV vs VZLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ODV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.20
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 1.45x
- Beta 1.20, current ratio 1.45x
VZLA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 60.9%
- 41.8% 10Y total return vs ODV's -54.3%
- 0.8% margin vs ODV's -476.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs ODV's -476.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs VZLA's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.7% vs VZLA's +47.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.1% ROA vs ODV's -16.8%, ROIC -7.2% vs -6.3% |
ODV vs VZLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODV and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $35M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$83M | -$34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$169M | -$16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$126M | -$45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ODV and VZLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $479M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $535M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.68x | -159.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.34x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VZLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VZLA delivers a -3.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-30 for ODV.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.1% | -3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | -3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | -7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.5% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $76M | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $133M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $144M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.93x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZLA five years ago would be worth $14,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,847 for ODV. Over the past 12 months, ODV leads with a +67.7% total return vs VZLA's +47.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZLA at 33.3% vs ODV's -14.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | -37.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.7% | +47.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +137.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.5% | +41.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.3% | +41.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.5% | +33.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ODV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ODV is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VZLA's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ODV currently trades 68.1% from its 52-week high vs VZLA's 48.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.80 | $7.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.74 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.1% | +48.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 7.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ODV as "Buy" and VZLA as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ODV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). VZLA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ODV vs VZLA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ODV or VZLA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Osisko Development Corp.
(ODV) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ODV or VZLA?
Over the past 5 years, Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) delivered a total return of +41. 8%, compared to -81. 5% for Osisko Development Corp. (ODV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VZLA returned +41. 8% versus ODV's -54. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ODV or VZLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Osisko Development Corp.
(ODV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Vizsla Silver Corp. 's 1. 34β — meaning VZLA is approximately 12% more volatile than ODV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ODV or VZLA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vizsla Silver Corp.
grew EPS 60. 9% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Osisko Development Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ODV or VZLA?
Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -476. 4% for Osisko Development Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZLA leads at 0. 0% versus -151. 1% for ODV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VZLA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ODV or VZLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ODV or VZLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Osisko Development Corp.
(ODV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODV: -54. 3%, VZLA: +41. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ODV and VZLA?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ODV is a small-cap high-growth stock; VZLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.