Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OEC vs KRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
OEC vs KRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $403M | $811M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.79B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-89M | $-134M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 10.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -3.1% |
| Forward P/E | 31.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $980M | $577M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $37M |
OEC vs KRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Engineered Ca… (OEC) | 100 | 64.8 | -35.2% |
| Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OEC vs KRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OEC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, current ratio 1.03x
- -5.0% margin vs KRO's -7.1%
KRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth -228.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs OEC's -29.7%
- Beta 1.57, yield 2.8%, current ratio 2.70x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.5% revenue growth vs OEC's -3.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.0% margin vs KRO's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs KRO's 1.57 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs KRO's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.2% vs OEC's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs KRO's -9.4%, ROIC 5.5% vs -1.9% |
OEC vs KRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OEC vs KRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OEC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRO and OEC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $1.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -5.0% (OEC) to -7.1% (KRO). On growth, KRO holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $180M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$89M | -$134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +10.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | -126.1% |
Valuation Metrics
OEC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OEC's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRO's 40.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $403M | $811M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.78x | -7.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.80x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.66x | 40.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.04x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRO delivers a -17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-17 in annual profit, vs $-22 for OEC. KRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OEC's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRO scores 5/9 vs OEC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | -17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | -9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | -2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.55x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $919M | $540M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $980M | $577M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.14x | -2.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRO five years ago would be worth $5,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,442 for OEC. Over the past 12 months, KRO leads with a -1.2% total return vs OEC's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRO at -0.2% vs OEC's -32.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | +58.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.4% | -1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | -43.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.7% | +129.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.3% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OEC and KRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OEC is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRO's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRO currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs OEC's 59.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.10 | $7.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.35 | $4.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.3% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.4 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 610K | 350K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OEC and KRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OEC as "Buy" and KRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -18.0% upside for OEC (target: $6) vs -29.1% for KRO (target: $5). For income investors, KRO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs OEC's 1.16%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.88 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.1% | 0.0% |
OEC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KRO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
OEC vs KRO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OEC or KRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is the stronger pick with -1. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for Orion Engineered Carbons S. A. (OEC). Analysts rate Orion Engineered Carbons S. A. (OEC) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OEC or KRO?
Over the past 5 years, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) delivered a total return of -43. 9%, compared to -65. 6% for Orion Engineered Carbons S. A. (OEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRO returned +129. 0% versus OEC's -29. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OEC or KRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Engineered Carbons S.
A. (OEC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Kronos Worldwide, Inc. 's 1. 57β — meaning KRO is approximately 13% more volatile than OEC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 3% for Orion Engineered Carbons S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OEC or KRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
(KRO) is pulling ahead at -1. 5% versus -3. 8% for Orion Engineered Carbons S. A. (OEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kronos Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS -228. 0% year-over-year, compared to -263. 2% for Orion Engineered Carbons S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRO leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OEC or KRO?
Orion Engineered Carbons S.
A. (OEC) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 9% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OEC leads at 5. 6% versus -1. 7% for KRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OEC leads at 19. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OEC or KRO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OEC: -18.
0% to $5. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — OEC or KRO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 2% for Orion Engineered Carbons S. A. (OEC).
08Is OEC or KRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orion Engineered Carbons S.
A. (OEC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield). Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OEC: -29. 7%, KRO: +129. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OEC and KRO?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.