Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $308M | $30.09B | $5.05B | $6.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98M | $4.88B | $2.47B | $2.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $1.35B | $358M | $464M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 32.9% | 73.3% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 35.9% | 22.1% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 21.9x | 16.5x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $9.30B | $5.24B | $3.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $204M | $6M | $577M |
OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Atmos Energy Corpor… (ATO) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| Southwest Gas Holdi… (SWX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFLX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and efficiency.
- 4.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ATO's 1.9%
- 12.9% ROA vs SR's 2.9%, ROIC 35.1% vs 4.7%
ATO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.8%
- 179.6% 10Y total return vs SR's 71.4%
- 12.9% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0%
- 27.6% margin vs OFLX's 13.6%
SR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.66 vs SWX's 2.67
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.67
SWX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.06 vs OFLX's 1.35
- +22.0% vs OFLX's +4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.6% margin vs OFLX's 13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs OFLX's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ATO's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.0% vs OFLX's +4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs SR's 2.9%, ROIC 35.1% vs 4.7% |
OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SR leads 1 • OFLX leads 1 • SWX leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 49.8x OFLX's $98M. ATO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OFLX's 13.6%. On growth, ATO holds the edge at +0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98M | $4.9B | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $2.5B | $864M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $1.3B | $358M | $464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | -$2.0B | -$2.7B | $72M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +32.9% | +73.3% | +33.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +35.9% | +22.1% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +27.6% | +14.5% | +18.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | -40.8% | -108.1% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +0.6% | -9.0% | -54.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | +14.5% | +31.1% | +20.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, SWX trades at a 39% valuation discount to ATO's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs ATO's 2.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $308M | $30.1B | $5.1B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $259M | $39.2B | $10.3B | $9.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.73x | 24.38x | 19.57x | 14.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.60x | 21.88x | 16.47x | 21.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.77x | 0.79x | 1.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.16x | 17.08x | 12.51x | 11.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 6.40x | 2.04x | 3.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.66x | 2.15x | 1.48x | 1.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.04x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OFLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OFLX delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for ATO. OFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SR's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWX scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +7.7% | +10.4% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | +4.5% | +2.9% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +35.1% | +5.5% | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +6.1% | +5.8% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.69x | 1.54x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$48M | $9.1B | $5.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $204M | $6M | $577M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $9.3B | $5.2B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.61x | 2.62x | 2.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATO five years ago would be worth $19,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,377 for OFLX. Over the past 12 months, SWX leads with a +22.0% total return vs OFLX's +4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWX at 20.5% vs OFLX's -32.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.9% | +8.0% | +3.8% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.8% | +14.1% | +16.6% | +22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | +62.9% | +38.7% | +74.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | +91.7% | +32.1% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +179.6% | +71.4% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.5% | +17.7% | +11.5% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATO and SWX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATO is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFLX's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWX currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs OFLX's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | -0.00x | 0.06x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.92 | $192.51 | $95.31 | $94.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.58 | $149.98 | $69.94 | $66.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +94.5% | +89.7% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 46.0 | 34.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 854K | 346K | 474K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OFLX and ATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATO as "Hold", SR as "Buy", SWX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for SR (target: $97) vs -1.6% for ATO (target: $179). For income investors, OFLX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs ATO's 1.90%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $179.00 | $97.00 | $96.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +1.9% | +3.6% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 28 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.36 | $3.45 | $3.10 | $2.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ATO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OFLX vs ATO vs SR vs SWX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger pick with 12.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Inc. (SR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX?
On trailing P/E, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Atmos Energy Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Spire Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX?
Over the past 5 years, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) delivered a total return of +91.
7%, compared to -76. 2% for Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATO returned +179. 6% versus OFLX's +39. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
00β versus Omega Flex, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning OFLX is approximately -39715% more volatile than ATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 154% for Spire Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is pulling ahead at 12.
9% versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to -17. 4% for Omega Flex, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SR leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX?
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
5% net margin versus 11. 0% for Spire Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATO leads at 33. 2% versus 17. 2% for OFLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Spire Inc. (SR) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Atmos Energy Corporation — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 13. 4% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Omega Flex, Inc. (OFLX) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 1. 9% for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO).
09Is OFLX or ATO or SR or SWX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
00), 1. 9% yield, +179. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATO: +179. 6%, OFLX: +39. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFLX and ATO and SR and SWX?
These companies operate in different sectors (OFLX (Industrials) and ATO (Utilities) and SR (Utilities) and SWX (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OFLX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ATO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SWX is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.