Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OGN
Organon & Co.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.47B
5Y Perf.-62.7%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1690.08T
5Y Perf.-66.3%
PRGO
Perrigo Company plc

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNYSE • IE
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-74.6%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$356.49B
5Y Perf.+78.0%
MCK
McKesson Corporation

Medical - Distribution

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$90.21B
5Y Perf.+282.8%

OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OGN logoOGN
DBVT logoDBVT
PRGO logoPRGO
ABBV logoABBV
MCK logoMCK
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - GeneralMedical - Distribution
Market Cap$3.47B$1690.08T$1.62B$356.49B$90.21B
Revenue (TTM)$6.22B$0.00$4.18B$61.16B$403.43B
Net Income (TTM)$187M$-168M$-1.82B$4.23B$4.76B
Gross Margin53.6%34.2%70.2%3.6%
Operating Margin20.0%-4.1%26.7%1.5%
Forward P/E3.9x5.5x14.2x16.7x
Total Debt$0.00$22M$3.97B$69.07B$8.61B
Cash & Equiv.$194M$532M$5.23B$3.98B

OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OGN
DBVT
PRGO
ABBV
MCK
StockMay 21May 26Return
Organon & Co. (OGN)10037.3-62.7%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10033.7-66.3%
Perrigo Company plc (PRGO)10025.4-74.6%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100178.0+78.0%
McKesson Corporation (MCK)100382.8+282.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OGN and ABBV are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. AbbVie Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. DBVT, PRGO, and MCK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OGN
Organon & Co.
The Value Play

OGN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and efficiency.

  • Lower P/E (3.9x vs 16.7x)
  • 20.6% ROE vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: value and efficiency
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Defensive Pick

DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
  • +100.5% vs PRGO's -52.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
PRGO
Perrigo Company plc
The Defensive Pick

PRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.21, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
  • 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: defensive
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.3%
  • 6.9% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
  • Beta 0.28 vs DBVT's 1.26
Best for: income & stability
MCK
McKesson Corporation
The Growth Play

MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 49.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
  • 339.0% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 293.8%
  • 12.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMCK logoMCK12.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueOGN logoOGNLower P/E (3.9x vs 16.7x)
Quality / MarginsABBV logoABBV6.9% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.28 vs DBVT's 1.26
DividendsPRGO logoPRGO9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+100.5% vs PRGO's -52.0%
Efficiency (ROA)OGN logoOGN20.6% ROE vs DBVT's -89.0%

OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OGNOrganon & Co.

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRGOPerrigo Company plc
FY 2025
Consumer Self-Care Americas
60.8%$2.6B
Consumer Self-Care International
39.2%$1.7B
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
MCKMcKesson Corporation
FY 2026
North American Pharmaceutical Segment
83.4%$336.7B
Oncology And Multispecialty Segment
12.0%$48.4B
Medical-Surgical Solutions Segment
2.9%$11.5B
Prescription Technology Solutions Segment
1.4%$5.8B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Excluding Corporate Nonsegment
0.3%$1.0B

OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCKLAGGINGDBVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

MCK and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $403.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ABBV is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOGN logoOGNOrganon & Co.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …PRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.2B$0$4.2B$61.2B$403.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.6B-$112M$58M$24.5B$6.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$187M-$168M-$1.8B$4.2B$4.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$308M-$151M$108M$18.7B$6.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.6%+34.2%+70.2%+3.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.0%-4.1%+26.7%+1.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.0%-43.5%+6.9%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.0%+2.6%+30.6%+1.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.3%-7.2%+10.0%+6.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.9%+91.5%-56.4%+57.4%+37.0%
ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.5x trailing earnings, OGN trades at a 78% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OGN's 2.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCK's 15.3x.

MetricOGN logoOGNOrganon & Co.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …PRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
Market CapShares × price$3.5B$1690.08T$1.6B$356.5B$90.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.5B$1690.08T$5.1B$420.3B$94.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.54x-0.75x-1.14x85.04x19.19x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.88x5.53x14.17x16.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.12x7.43x14.89x15.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.56x0.38x5.83x0.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.84x0.65x0.55x11.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.17x20.01x14.66x
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCK scores 7/9 vs OGN's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOGN logoOGNOrganon & Co.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …PRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.6%-130.2%-50.7%+62.1%+3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-89.0%-19.8%+3.1%+5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+19.8%+3.7%+23.9%+74.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-145.7%+4.3%+21.5%+43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–904467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x1.35x1.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$0-$172M$3.4B$63.8B$4.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$194M$532M$5.2B$4.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$22M$4.0B$69.1B$8.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.36x-189.82x-7.20x3.28x33.79x
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $37,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCK at 26.4% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOGN logoOGNOrganon & Co.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …PRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+84.7%+3.6%-13.6%-10.6%-10.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+48.9%+100.5%-52.0%+12.2%+7.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.2%+18.1%-58.1%+49.7%+102.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.0%-68.3%-60.3%+99.6%+270.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.0%-87.1%-77.7%+293.8%+339.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.4%+5.7%-25.2%+14.4%+26.4%
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — OGN and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCK is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OGN currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOGN logoOGNOrganon & Co.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …PRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.09x1.26x1.21x0.28x-0.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.44$26.18$28.44$244.81$999.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.69$7.53$9.23$176.57$637.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+75.3%+41.2%+82.3%+73.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10077.747.453.143.921.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.6M252K3.3M5.8M782K
Evenly matched — OGN and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: OGN as "Hold", DBVT as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", ABBV as "Buy", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs -15.1% for OGN (target: $11). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.82% vs MCK's 0.42%.

MetricOGN logoOGNOrganon & Co.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …PRGO logoPRGOPerrigo Company p…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.33$46.33$36.20$256.69$994.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts915364131
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.8%+3.3%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00101318
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.15$6.57$3.07
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MCK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ABBV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallMcKesson Corporation (MCK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OGN vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ABBV vs MCK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger pick with 12.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Organon & Co. (OGN). Organon & Co. (OGN) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (3. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK?

On trailing P/E, Organon & Co.

(OGN) is the cheapest at 18. 5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Organon & Co. is actually cheaper at 3. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK?

Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +270.

4%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +339. 0% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

02β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately -7786% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is pulling ahead at 12.

4% versus -2. 9% for Organon & Co. (OGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McKesson Corporation grew EPS 49. 2% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCK leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK?

AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABBV leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Organon & Co.

(OGN) trades at 3. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for McKesson Corporation — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK?

In this comparison, PRGO (9.

8% yield), ABBV (3. 3% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. OGN, DBVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OGN or DBVT or PRGO or ABBV or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OGN and DBVT and PRGO and ABBV and MCK?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; MCK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO, ABBV pay a dividend while OGN, DBVT, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OGN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRGO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.