Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OI vs AMBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
OI vs AMBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $2.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.40B | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-186M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.00B | $4.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $759M | $522M |
OI vs AMBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) | 100 | 85.8 | -14.2% |
| Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OI vs AMBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.08
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.0x)
AMBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- -44.3% 10Y total return vs OI's -50.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs OI's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs OI's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs OI's 1.08 | |
| Dividends | 11.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.3% vs OI's -30.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs OI's -2.0%, ROIC 6.5% vs 8.4% |
OI vs AMBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OI vs AMBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OI and AMBP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OI and AMBP operate at a comparable scale, with $6.4B and $5.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (AMBP) to -2.9% (OI). On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $753M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$186M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $474M | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +10.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +58.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OI's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMBP's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.82x | -215.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.01x | 16.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.02x | 8.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.29x | 8.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMBP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.46x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $759M | $522M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMBP five years ago would be worth $5,413 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,014 for OI. Over the past 12 months, AMBP leads with a +21.3% total return vs OI's -30.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.5% vs OI's -25.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.0% | -1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.9% | +21.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.7% | +35.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -45.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | -44.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.0% | +10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMBP is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OI's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMBP currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs OI's 53.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.91 | $5.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $3.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.8% | +78.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.4 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OI as "Hold" and AMBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 91.4% upside for OI (target: $17) vs 13.9% for AMBP (target: $5). AMBP is the only dividend payer here at 11.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.40 | $4.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | 0.0% |
AMBP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). OI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OI vs AMBP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OI or AMBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). Analysts rate O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) a "Hold" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OI or AMBP?
Over the past 5 years, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) delivered a total return of -45. 9%, compared to -49. 9% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMBP returned -44. 3% versus OI's -50. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OI or AMBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus O-I Glass, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning OI is approximately 33% more volatile than AMBP relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OI or AMBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus -1. 6% for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. grew EPS 59. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 7% for O-I Glass, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OI or AMBP?
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -2. 0% for O-I Glass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OI leads at 9. 9% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OI leads at 17. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OI or AMBP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, O-I Glass, Inc.
(OI) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OI: 91. 4% to $17. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — OI or AMBP?
In this comparison, AMBP (11.
0% yield) pays a dividend. OI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OI or AMBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 11. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMBP: -44. 3%, OI: -50. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OI and AMBP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AMBP pays a dividend while OI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.