Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $54.10B | $57.12B | $89.22B | $81.56B | $70.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35.20B | $12.54B | $11.92B | $52.60B | $17.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.53B | $4.71B | $2.84B | $5.80B | $3.31B |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 60.0% | 62.8% | 13.6% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 44.9% | 38.8% | 13.5% | 28.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 12.7x | 31.2x | 13.1x | 22.3x |
| Total Debt | $32.82B | $26.16B | $29.36B | $34.93B | $32.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $2.14B | $63M | $1.25B | $109M |
OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) | 100 | 232.1 | +132.1% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
| The Williams Compan… (WMB) | 100 | 352.2 | +252.2% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 202.6 | +102.6% |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) | 100 | 208.0 | +108.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 55.4%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 55.4% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 13.1x)
- 37.5% margin vs OKE's 10.0%
- 7.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs OKE's 4.8%
- 11.3% ROA vs KMI's 4.5%, ROIC 9.9% vs 5.6%
WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 371.1% 10Y total return vs MPLX's 184.4%
EPD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06, yield 5.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs MPLX's 0.18, lower leverage
KMI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.23 vs EPD's 1.42
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.4% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs OKE's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs MPLX's 0.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs OKE's 4.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.7% vs OKE's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs KMI's 4.5%, ROIC 9.9% vs 5.6% |
OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
WMB leads 1 • OKE leads 0 • EPD leads 0 • KMI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPD is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.6B annually — 4.4x WMB's $11.9B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OKE's 10.0%. On growth, OKE holds the edge at +19.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35.2B | $12.5B | $11.9B | $52.6B | $17.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.6B | $7.0B | $6.8B | $9.7B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $4.7B | $2.8B | $5.8B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $5.0B | $722M | $3.0B | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +60.0% | +62.8% | +13.6% | +46.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +44.9% | +38.8% | +13.5% | +28.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +37.5% | +23.8% | +11.0% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +39.8% | +6.1% | +5.6% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +5.2% | -0.6% | -2.9% | +13.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | -17.3% | +24.6% | +2.7% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MPLX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 66% valuation discount to WMB's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KMI offers better value at 0.24x vs EPD's 1.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54.1B | $57.1B | $89.2B | $81.6B | $70.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86.8B | $81.1B | $118.5B | $115.2B | $102.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.84x | 11.67x | 34.09x | 14.18x | 23.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.22x | 12.71x | 31.23x | 13.14x | 22.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — | 0.52x | 1.54x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.24x | 13.27x | 17.56x | 12.10x | 14.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 4.83x | 7.47x | 1.55x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.40x | 3.95x | 5.94x | 2.70x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.11x | 13.93x | 88.77x | 27.51x | 21.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $10 for KMI. KMI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMB's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMI scores 8/9 vs OKE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | +32.8% | +19.0% | +19.3% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +11.3% | +4.9% | +7.5% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +9.9% | +7.7% | +8.3% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +12.9% | +8.7% | +10.9% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.45x | 1.80x | 1.96x | 1.14x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.7B | $24.0B | $29.3B | $33.7B | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $2.1B | $63M | $1.2B | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32.8B | $26.2B | $29.4B | $34.9B | $32.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.56x | 5.85x | 3.37x | 5.21x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMB five years ago would be worth $32,449 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,768 for OKE. Over the past 12 months, EPD leads with a +31.7% total return vs OKE's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMB at 38.6% vs OKE's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +6.4% | +20.7% | +20.7% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +22.5% | +27.2% | +31.7% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.3% | +95.7% | +166.3% | +73.8% | +107.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.7% | +157.2% | +224.5% | +105.7% | +108.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.5% | +184.4% | +371.1% | +119.8% | +142.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.6% | +25.1% | +38.6% | +20.2% | +27.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OKE and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPLX's 0.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EPD currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs OKE's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.18x | 0.13x | 0.06x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.30 | $59.98 | $77.41 | $39.73 | $34.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.02 | $47.80 | $55.82 | $29.90 | $25.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +93.8% | +94.2% | +95.0% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 46.5 | 52.8 | 47.0 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 1.8M | 5.8M | 4.1M | 12.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OKE and MPLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OKE as "Hold", MPLX as "Buy", WMB as "Buy", EPD as "Buy", KMI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.1% upside for KMI (target: $35) vs -1.9% for EPD (target: $37). For income investors, MPLX offers the higher dividend yield at 7.01% vs WMB's 2.74%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.88 | $60.25 | $79.00 | $37.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 28 | 34 | 45 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +7.0% | +2.7% | +5.7% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.09 | $3.94 | $2.00 | $2.14 | $1.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
MPLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
OKE vs MPLX vs WMB vs EPD vs KMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ONEOK, Inc.
(OKE) is the stronger pick with 55. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MPLX Lp (MPLX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, MPLX Lp is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI?
Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) delivered a total return of +224. 5%, compared to +97. 7% for ONEOK, Inc. (OKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +365. 9% versus EPD's +119. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ONEOK, Inc.
(OKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus MPLX Lp's 0. 18β — meaning MPLX is approximately 409% more volatile than OKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ONEOK, Inc.
(OKE) is pulling ahead at 55. 4% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Williams Companies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OKE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 10. 1% for ONEOK, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus 13. 1% for EPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, MPLX Lp (MPLX) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMI: 11. 1% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).
09Is OKE or MPLX or WMB or EPD or KMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.
(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 2. 7% yield, +365. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +365. 9%, MPLX: +184. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OKE and MPLX and WMB and EPD and KMI?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.