Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ET

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$54.10B
5Y Perf.+134.0%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$54.26B
5Y Perf.+1311.1%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$89.22B
5Y Perf.+257.1%
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$70.10B
5Y Perf.+99.4%
ET
Energy Transfer LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$68.53B
5Y Perf.+144.1%

OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ET — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OKE logoOKE
TRGP logoTRGP
WMB logoWMB
KMI logoKMI
ET logoET
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$54.10B$54.26B$89.22B$70.10B$68.53B
Revenue (TTM)$35.20B$16.38B$11.92B$17.52B$89.38B
Net Income (TTM)$3.53B$2.13B$2.84B$3.31B$5.55B
Gross Margin23.9%22.1%62.8%46.9%22.9%
Operating Margin20.3%21.1%38.8%28.6%11.1%
Forward P/E15.2x24.9x31.2x22.3x12.3x
Total Debt$32.82B$17.55B$29.36B$32.39B$71.61B
Cash & Equiv.$78M$166M$63M$109M$1.27B

OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ETLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OKE
TRGP
WMB
KMI
ET
StockMay 20May 26Return
ONEOK, Inc. (OKE)100234.0+134.0%
Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP)1001411.1+1311.1%
The Williams Compan… (WMB)100357.1+257.1%
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI)100199.4+99.4%
Energy Transfer LP (ET)100244.1+144.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ET

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TRGP and ET are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Energy Transfer LP is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. OKE, WMB, and KMI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.
The Income Pick

OKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 4.8%
  • Beta 0.14, yield 4.8%, current ratio 0.71x
  • 55.4% revenue growth vs ET's -0.1%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

TRGP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.

  • 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMB's 371.1%
  • +61.6% vs OKE's +12.2%
  • 8.5% ROA vs ET's 4.1%, ROIC 13.2% vs 6.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
The Growth Play

WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • 23.8% margin vs ET's 6.2%
Best for: growth exposure
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KMI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 0.64x
  • PEG 0.23 vs OKE's 0.50
  • Beta 0.10 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
ET
Energy Transfer LP
The Value Play

ET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (12.3x vs 31.2x)
  • 6.5% yield, vs OKE's 4.8%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOKE logoOKE55.4% revenue growth vs ET's -0.1%
ValueET logoETLower P/E (12.3x vs 31.2x)
Quality / MarginsWMB logoWMB23.8% margin vs ET's 6.2%
Stability / SafetyKMI logoKMIBeta 0.10 vs TRGP's 0.29, lower leverage
DividendsET logoET6.5% yield, vs OKE's 4.8%
Momentum (1Y)TRGP logoTRGP+61.6% vs OKE's +12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)TRGP logoTRGP8.5% ROA vs ET's 4.1%, ROIC 13.2% vs 6.3%

OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OKEONEOK, Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas Liquids
43.6%$16.0B
Refined Products and Crude Oil
35.5%$13.0B
Natural Gas Gathering And Processing
20.9%$7.7B
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.
FY 2025
Logistics And Transportation
66.4%$14.6B
Gathering And Processing
33.8%$7.4B
Corporate Non Segment And Inter Segment Elimination
-0.1%$-32,400,000
WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Gas & NGL Marketing Services
71.6%$7.2B
West
28.4%$2.8B
KMIKinder Morgan, Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas Pipelines
64.9%$11.0B
Products Pipelines
15.8%$2.7B
Terminals
12.4%$2.1B
CO2
6.9%$1.2B
ETEnergy Transfer LP
FY 2024
Oil and Gas
30.7%$25.4B
Oil and Gas, Refining and Marketing
26.7%$22.1B
NGL sales
23.1%$19.1B
Natural Gas, Midstream
14.5%$12.0B
Natural gas sales
3.3%$2.7B
Product and Service, Other
1.7%$1.4B

OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ET — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTRGPLAGGINGKMI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ET is the larger business by revenue, generating $89.4B annually — 7.5x WMB's $11.9B. WMB is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ET's 6.2%. On growth, ET holds the edge at +32.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35.2B$16.4B$11.9B$17.5B$89.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$8.6B$5.0B$6.8B$7.5B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.5B$2.1B$2.8B$3.3B$5.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.2B$1.2B$722M$3.9B$5.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.9%+22.1%+62.8%+46.9%+22.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.3%+21.1%+38.8%+28.6%+11.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.0%+13.0%+23.8%+18.9%+6.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.4%+7.1%+6.1%+22.2%+6.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.6%-15.6%-0.6%+13.5%+32.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.3%-100.0%+24.6%+37.5%-2.8%
WMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ET leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.8x trailing earnings, ET trades at a 57% valuation discount to WMB's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KMI offers better value at 0.24x vs WMB's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
Market CapShares × price$54.1B$54.3B$89.2B$70.1B$68.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$86.8B$71.6B$118.5B$102.4B$138.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.84x29.63x34.09x23.00x14.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.22x24.88x31.23x22.29x12.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x0.52x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.24x14.44x17.56x14.09x9.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.61x3.17x7.47x4.14x0.83x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.40x16.97x5.94x2.16x1.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.11x92.90x88.77x21.76x17.82x
ET leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

TRGP delivers a 70.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $10 for KMI. KMI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRGP's 5.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMI scores 8/9 vs ET's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.9%+70.8%+19.0%+10.3%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+8.5%+4.9%+4.5%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.6%+13.2%+7.7%+5.6%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.6%+16.7%+8.7%+7.0%+7.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956785
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.45x5.49x1.96x1.00x1.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$32.7B$17.4B$29.3B$32.3B$70.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$78M$166M$63M$109M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$32.8B$17.5B$29.4B$32.4B$71.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.56x6.52x3.37x2.86x2.64x
TRGP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,768 for OKE. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs OKE's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs OKE's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.4%+36.4%+20.7%+15.9%+22.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.2%+61.6%+27.2%+18.3%+25.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+54.3%+268.0%+166.3%+107.0%+90.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+97.7%+592.2%+224.5%+108.4%+158.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+210.5%+618.0%+371.1%+142.1%+142.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.6%+54.4%+38.6%+27.4%+23.9%
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KMI and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KMI is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRGP's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ET currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs OKE's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.14x0.29x0.17x0.10x0.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$95.30$261.95$77.41$34.73$20.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$64.02$144.14$55.82$25.60$16.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.1%+96.4%+94.2%+90.7%+96.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.954.152.842.559.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.7M1.3M5.8M12.4M14.8M
Evenly matched — KMI and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — OKE and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: OKE as "Hold", TRGP as "Buy", WMB as "Buy", KMI as "Hold", ET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.1% upside for KMI (target: $35) vs -5.8% for TRGP (target: $238). For income investors, ET offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs TRGP's 1.51%.

MetricOKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.TRGP logoTRGPTarga Resources C…WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$89.88$237.70$79.00$35.00$19.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3933343432
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.8%+1.5%+2.7%+3.7%+6.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises224890
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.09$3.81$2.00$1.17$1.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+1.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — OKE and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TRGP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WMB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallTarga Resources Corp. (TRGP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OKE vs TRGP vs WMB vs KMI vs ET: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the stronger pick with 55. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET?

On trailing P/E, Energy Transfer LP (ET) is the cheapest at 14.

8x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Energy Transfer LP is actually cheaper at 12. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus ONEOK, Inc. 's 0. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET?

Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.

(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +97. 7% for ONEOK, Inc. (OKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus KMI's +142. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kinder Morgan, Inc.

(KMI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Targa Resources Corp. 's 0. 29β — meaning TRGP is approximately 210% more volatile than KMI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 5% for Targa Resources Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is pulling ahead at 55. 4% versus -0. 1% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for ONEOK, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OKE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET?

The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 11. 4% for ET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KMI leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus ONEOK, Inc. 's 0. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Energy Transfer LP (ET) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMI: 11. 1% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).

09

Is OKE or TRGP or WMB or KMI or ET better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.

(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, ET: +142. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OKE and TRGP and WMB and KMI and ET?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OKE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRGP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KMI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OKE and TRGP and WMB and KMI and ET on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OKE: 19.6% · TRGP: -15.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(OKE: 10.0% · TRGP: 13.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(OKE: 15.8x · TRGP: 29.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.