Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $57M | $2.03B | $7.70B | $3.33B | $9.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $298M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $298M | $-327M | $-472M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.7% | — | — | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 41.7% | — | — | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.5x | — | — | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $549K | $75M | $110K | $137K | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $80M | $357M | $166M | $214M |
OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| Aurinia Pharmaceuti… (AUPH) | 100 | 119.2 | +19.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 58.0 | -42.0% |
| Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX) | 100 | 449.9 | +349.9% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 56.4 | -43.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 10.28x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 10.28x
- 84.4% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
AUPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.95
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.3%
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 16.9x)
- 100.0% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +491.9% vs VKTX's +0.6%
VKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 22.0% 10Y total return vs AUPH's 499.2%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 84.4% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 100.0% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs VKTX's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +491.9% vs VKTX's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 47.6% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC 16.6% vs -44.4% |
OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AUPH leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRL leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • OKUR leads 0 • VKTX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. AUPH is the more profitable business, keeping 100.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, AUPH holds the edge at +24.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $298M | $0 | $0 | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | $144M | -$357M | -$502M | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $298M | -$327M | -$472M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | $166M | -$283M | -$340M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.7% | — | — | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +41.7% | — | — | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% | — | — | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +55.5% | — | — | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +24.4% | — | — | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +56.3% | +2.7% | -2.3% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AUPH's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $2.0B | $7.7B | $3.3B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $2.0B | $7.3B | $3.2B | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 7.64x | -19.77x | -9.01x | -64.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.48x | — | — | 16.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.77x | — | — | 13.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.19x | — | — | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 3.77x | 6.83x | 5.07x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.03x | — | — | 17.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH delivers a 64.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $64 in annual profit, vs $-71 for VKTX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUPH scores 7/9 vs VKTX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.3% | +64.5% | -43.0% | -71.3% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.5% | +47.6% | -40.2% | -65.3% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.6% | -65.0% | -44.4% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.4% | +18.9% | -49.3% | -51.8% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$5M | -$357M | -$166M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $80M | $357M | $166M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $549,000 | $75M | $110,000 | $137,000 | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5448.00x | 16.47x | — | -15687.44x | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $47,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs VKTX's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.9% | +3.1% | -6.9% | -18.8% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.4% | +92.2% | +491.9% | +0.6% | +23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +57.9% | +1757.4% | +21.1% | -8.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +25.2% | -14.2% | +372.9% | -47.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +499.2% | -36.1% | +2200.0% | +122.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.7% | +16.4% | +164.8% | +6.6% | -3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VKTX's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUPH currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs VKTX's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.95x | 1.55x | 1.64x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.38 | $16.88 | $366.52 | $43.15 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $7.29 | $37.19 | $22.96 | $143.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +93.7% | +72.7% | +66.6% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 53.2 | 31.9 | 41.5 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 210K | 1.1M | 396K | 2.0M | 767K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AUPH as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", VKTX as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 225.6% upside for VKTX (target: $94) vs -20.4% for AUPH (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.60 | $607.15 | $93.60 | $213.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 16 | 24 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
AUPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?
On forward P/E, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
(VKTX) delivered a total return of +372. 9%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VKTX returned +22. 0% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Viking Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning VKTX is approximately 73% more volatile than AUPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUPH leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the more profitable company, earning 101. 5% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 101. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUPH leads at 37. 1% versus 0. 0% for VKTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUPH leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VKTX: 225. 6% to $93. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), +499. 2% 10Y return). Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUPH: +499. 2%, VKTX: +22. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OKUR and AUPH and PRAX and VKTX and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.