Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
OKUR logo
OKUR
AUPH logo
AUPH
PRAX logo
PRAX
VKTX logo
VKTX
CRL logo
CRL
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.+19.2%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-42.0%
VKTX
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.33B
5Y Perf.+349.9%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.-43.6%

OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OKUR logoOKUR
AUPH logoAUPH
PRAX logoPRAX
VKTX logoVKTX
CRL logoCRL
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$57M$2.03B$7.70B$3.33B$9.03B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$298M$0.00$0.00$4.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$298M$-327M$-472M$-185M
Gross Margin89.7%31.9%
Operating Margin41.7%11.8%
Forward P/E16.5x16.9x
Total Debt$549K$75M$110K$137K$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$59M$80M$357M$166M$214M

OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OKUR
AUPH
PRAX
VKTX
CRL
StockApr 21Jun 26Return
OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR)1002.9-97.1%
Aurinia Pharmaceuti… (AUPH)100119.2+19.2%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10058.0-42.0%
Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX)100449.9+349.9%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10056.4-43.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AUPH leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇AUPH emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

OKUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 10.28x
  • Beta 1.34, current ratio 10.28x
  • 84.4% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Income Pick

AUPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.95
  • Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.3%
  • Lower P/E (16.5x vs 16.9x)
  • 100.0% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +491.9% vs VKTX's +0.6%
Best for: momentum
VKTX
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

VKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 22.0% 10Y total return vs AUPH's 499.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOKUR logoOKUR84.4% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
ValueAUPH logoAUPHLower P/E (16.5x vs 16.9x)
Quality / MarginsAUPH logoAUPH100.0% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
Stability / SafetyAUPH logoAUPHBeta 0.95 vs VKTX's 1.64
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs VKTX's +0.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AUPH logoAUPH47.6% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC 16.6% vs -44.4%

OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the GLP-1 Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the GLP-1 Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
OKUROnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AUPHAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2025
Product
95.9%$271M
License, Collaboration and Royalty Revenue
4.1%$12M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
VKTXViking Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M

OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAUPHLAGGINGVKTX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRL and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. AUPH is the more profitable business, keeping 100.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, AUPH holds the edge at +24.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$298M$0$0$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$61M$144M-$357M-$502M$824M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M$298M-$327M-$472M-$185M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$51M$166M-$283M-$340M$391M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.7%+31.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.7%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+100.0%-4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+55.5%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.4%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%+56.3%+2.7%-2.3%-160.0%
AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AUPH's 17.8x.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Market CapShares × price$57M$2.0B$7.7B$3.3B$9.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$1M$2.0B$7.3B$3.2B$11.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.95x7.64x-19.77x-9.01x-64.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.48x16.90x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.77x13.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.19x2.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.01x3.77x6.83x5.07x2.89x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.03x17.42x
CRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AUPH delivers a 64.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $64 in annual profit, vs $-71 for VKTX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUPH scores 7/9 vs VKTX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-45.3%+64.5%-43.0%-71.3%-5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.5%+47.6%-40.2%-65.3%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.6%-65.0%-44.4%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-78.4%+18.9%-49.3%-51.8%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937324
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.13x0.00x0.00x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$59M-$5M-$357M-$166M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$59M$80M$357M$166M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$549,000$75M$110,000$137,000$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5448.00x16.47x-15687.44x4.29x
AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $47,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs VKTX's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.9%+3.1%-6.9%-18.8%-7.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.4%+92.2%+491.9%+0.6%+23.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.2%+57.9%+1757.4%+21.1%-8.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.4%+25.2%-14.2%+372.9%-47.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.2%+499.2%-36.1%+2200.0%+122.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.7%+16.4%+164.8%+6.6%-3.0%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AUPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VKTX's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUPH currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs VKTX's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x0.95x1.55x1.64x1.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.38$16.88$366.52$43.15$228.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.91$7.29$37.19$22.96$143.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.1%+93.7%+72.7%+66.6%+81.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.853.231.941.560.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded210K1.1M396K2.0M767K
AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AUPH as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", VKTX as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 225.6% upside for VKTX (target: $94) vs -20.4% for AUPH (target: $13).

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.60$607.15$93.60$213.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts14162437
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.8%0.0%0.0%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AUPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OKUR vs AUPH vs PRAX vs VKTX vs CRL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?

On forward P/E, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?

Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

(VKTX) delivered a total return of +372. 9%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VKTX returned +22. 0% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Viking Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning VKTX is approximately 73% more volatile than AUPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUPH leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the more profitable company, earning 101. 5% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 101. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUPH leads at 37. 1% versus 0. 0% for VKTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUPH leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VKTX: 225. 6% to $93. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is OKUR or AUPH or PRAX or VKTX or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), +499. 2% 10Y return). Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUPH: +499. 2%, VKTX: +22. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OKUR and AUPH and PRAX and VKTX and CRL?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.