Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $57M | $3.59B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $57M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-107M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 97.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -206.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $549K | $34M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $112M | $343.34B |
OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX) | 100 | 264.7 | +164.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 208.5 | +108.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 84.4% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
TNGX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 48.3%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 16.32x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 16.32x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs TNGX's 202.4%
- 20.4% margin vs TNGX's -188.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 84.4% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs TNGX's -188.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs OKUR's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5% |
OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and OKUR operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TNGX's -188.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $57M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | -$115M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$107M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | -$143M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +97.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -188.2% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +11.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OKUR and TNGX and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $3.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $3.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | -35.56x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 57.62x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 10.38x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OKUR. OKUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs OKUR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.3% | -41.5% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.5% | -33.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -38.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.4% | -34.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.10x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$79M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $112M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $549,000 | $34M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5448.00x | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNGX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNGX five years ago would be worth $28,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +512.7% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNGX at 106.2% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.9% | +246.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.4% | +512.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +776.5% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +182.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +202.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.7% | +106.2% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OKUR's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs OKUR's 78.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.31x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.38 | $32.79 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $4.40 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +94.4% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 63.7 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 210K | 3.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TNGX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for TNGX (target: $43) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $42.70 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TNGX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKUR or TNGX or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or TNGX or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) delivered a total return of +182. 6%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OKUR or TNGX or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning OKUR is approximately 42% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OKUR or TNGX or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tango Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -11. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OKUR or TNGX or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -162. 9% for Tango Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -178. 4% for TNGX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNGX leads at 96. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OKUR or TNGX or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNGX: 38.
0% to $42. 70.
07Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or TNGX or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. OKUR, TNGX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OKUR or TNGX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, OKUR: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OKUR and TNGX and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (OKUR (Healthcare) and TNGX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while OKUR, TNGX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.