Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
OKUR logo
OKUR
TNGX logo
TNGX
JPM logo
JPM
KYMR logo
KYMR
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.59B
5Y Perf.+164.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+108.5%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+89.3%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-42.0%

OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OKUR logoOKUR
TNGX logoTNGX
JPM logoJPM
KYMR logoKYMR
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$57M$3.59B$896.00B$7.04B$7.70B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$57M$280.33B$51M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$-107M$57.05B$-315M$-327M
Gross Margin97.3%60.0%33.2%
Operating Margin-206.2%25.9%-7.0%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$549K$34M$942.38B$82M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$59M$112M$343.34B$357M$357M

OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OKUR
TNGX
JPM
KYMR
PRAX
StockApr 21Jun 26Return
OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR)1002.9-97.1%
Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX)100264.7+164.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100208.5+108.5%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100189.3+89.3%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10058.0-42.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. TNGX and KYMR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Leader

OKUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 84.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

TNGX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 48.3%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.9%
  • +5.1% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs TNGX's 202.4%
  • 20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 1.3% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.91
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91 vs PRAX's 1.55
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PRAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOKUR logoOKUR84.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 0.91 vs PRAX's 1.55
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TNGX logoTNGX+5.1% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5%

OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OKUROnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNGXTango Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
100.0%$62M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGPRAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$57M$280.3B$51M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$61M-$115M$81.4B-$352M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M-$107M$57.0B-$315M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$51M-$143M$100.9B-$244M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+97.3%+60.0%+33.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.1%+25.9%-7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-188.2%+20.4%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.5%+36.0%-4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+55.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%+11.1%+16.0%+13.4%+2.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — OKUR and TNGX and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$57M$3.6B$896.0B$7.0B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$1M$3.5B$1.50T$6.8B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.95x-35.56x16.00x-23.36x-19.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue57.62x3.20x179.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.01x10.38x2.47x4.61x6.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — OKUR and TNGX and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OKUR. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-45.3%-41.5%+15.9%-25.0%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.5%-33.4%+1.3%-22.3%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-38.5%+4.5%-24.9%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-78.4%-34.0%+8.9%-27.2%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934543
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.10x2.60x0.05x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$59M-$79M$599.0B-$275M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$59M$112M$343.3B$357M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$549,000$34M$942.4B$82M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5448.00x0.74x-2119.53x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TNGX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNGX five years ago would be worth $28,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +512.7% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.9%+246.5%-0.5%+18.5%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.4%+512.7%+21.8%+82.3%+491.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.2%+776.5%+138.2%+242.9%+1757.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.4%+182.6%+118.2%+70.4%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.2%+202.4%+465.8%+159.2%-36.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.7%+106.2%+33.6%+50.8%+164.8%
TNGX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs PRAX's 72.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x1.31x0.94x0.91x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.38$32.79$337.25$103.00$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.91$4.40$262.71$36.65$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.1%+94.4%+95.1%+83.7%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.863.759.156.831.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded210K3.6M7.0M492K396K
Evenly matched — JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: TNGX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…TNGX logoTNGXTango Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$42.70$339.75$112.60$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts13612616
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TNGX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OKUR vs TNGX vs JPM vs KYMR vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

(TNGX) delivered a total return of +182. 6%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 70% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.

(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tango Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNGX leads at 35. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127.

8% to $607. 15.

07

Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. OKUR, TNGX, KYMR, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is OKUR or TNGX or JPM or KYMR or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between OKUR and TNGX and JPM and KYMR and PRAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (OKUR (Healthcare) and TNGX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KYMR (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while OKUR, TNGX, KYMR, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.