Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OKYO vs LNTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
OKYO vs LNTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $66M | $5.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $279M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $738K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $359M |
OKYO vs LNTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKYO vs LNTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKYO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.79
- EPS growth 0.1%
LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs OKYO's -55.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 2.70x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.5% revenue growth vs OKYO's -11K% | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs OKYO's -23.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs OKYO's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.1% vs OKYO's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs OKYO's -128.4% |
OKYO vs LNTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKYO vs LNTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OKYO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH and OKYO operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $347M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $279M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $372M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.3% | +76.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OKYO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66M | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64M | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.50x | 26.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNTH scores 5/9 vs OKYO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +24.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -128.4% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +30.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$358M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $359M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $738,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.03x | 11.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNTH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,475 for OKYO. Over the past 12 months, LNTH leads with a +13.1% total return vs OKYO's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNTH at -1.4% vs OKYO's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.4% | +35.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | +314.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | +4192.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.7% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OKYO's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs OKYO's 48.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.35 | $93.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $47.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.4% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 93K | 886K |
Analyst Outlook
OKYO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $101.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.1% |
OKYO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LNTH leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
OKYO vs LNTH: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKYO or LNTH a better buy right now?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OKYO or LNTH?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to -55. 2% for OKYO Pharma Limited (OKYO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus OKYO's -55. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OKYO or LNTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus OKYO Pharma Limited's 0. 79β — meaning OKYO is approximately 69% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — OKYO or LNTH?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 0. 0% for OKYO Pharma Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus 0. 0% for OKYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNTH leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — OKYO or LNTH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is OKYO or LNTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, OKYO: -55. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between OKYO and LNTH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.