Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OLB vs FOUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
OLB vs FOUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $919K | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $3.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | -15.7% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -85.3% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $375K | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27K | $964M |
OLB vs FOUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OLB vs FOUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, OLB is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
FOUR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 25.5%, EPS growth -64.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- 39.7% 10Y total return vs OLB's -98.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% revenue growth vs OLB's -58.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs OLB's -92.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs OLB's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -43.7% vs OLB's -63.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs OLB's -72.9%, ROIC 6.3% vs -108.7% |
OLB vs FOUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OLB vs FOUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 345.7x OLB's $10M. FOUR is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OLB's -92.7%. On growth, OLB holds the edge at -25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $629M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $687M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -85.3% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -92.7% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.9% | -105.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OLB leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $919,106 | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | 43.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOUR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOUR delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-170 for OLB. OLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs OLB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -169.9% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -72.9% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -148.0% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 2.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $347,613 | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27,436 | $964M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $375,049 | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.60x | 3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOUR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOUR five years ago would be worth $5,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $105 for OLB. Over the past 12 months, FOUR leads with a -43.7% total return vs OLB's -63.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOUR at -8.7% vs OLB's -60.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.1% | -25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.9% | -43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -24.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -46.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +39.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.6% | -8.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FOUR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OLB's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOUR currently trades 43.2% from its 52-week high vs OLB's 19.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $108.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $39.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.8% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 666K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FOUR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $73.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.8% |
FOUR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OLB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
OLB vs FOUR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OLB or FOUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the stronger pick with 25. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 0% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OLB or FOUR?
Over the past 5 years, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) delivered a total return of -46. 4%, compared to -98. 9% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +39. 7% versus OLB's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OLB or FOUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus The OLB Group, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning OLB is approximately 8% more volatile than FOUR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OLB or FOUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is pulling ahead at 25. 5% versus -58. 0% for The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The OLB Group, Inc. grew EPS 60. 2% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOUR leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OLB or FOUR?
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -87. 4% for The OLB Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOUR leads at 8. 4% versus -90. 9% for OLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOUR leads at 34. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OLB or FOUR?
In this comparison, FOUR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. OLB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is OLB or FOUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield). The OLB Group, Inc. (OLB) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOUR: +39. 7%, OLB: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OLB and FOUR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock. FOUR pays a dividend while OLB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.