OLN vs CE

For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE). Analysts rate Olin Corporation (OLN) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Olin Corporation (OLN) delivered a total return of -29.

4%, compared to -57. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OLN returned +67. 4% versus CE's +16. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Celanese Corporation (CE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

11β versus Olin Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning OLN is approximately 33% more volatile than CE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Olin Corporation (OLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 176% versus 3% for Celanese Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.

7% versus -7. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Celanese Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -140. 7% for Olin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CE leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Olin Corporation (OLN) is the more profitable company, earning -0.

6% net margin versus -12. 2% for Celanese Corporation — meaning it keeps -0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CE leads at 8. 0% versus 1. 7% for OLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CE leads at 18. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CE: 5.

3% to $65. 40.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Olin Corporation (OLN) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 2% for Celanese Corporation (CE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLN: +67. 4%, CE: +16. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

OLN pays a dividend while CE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.