OLN
Olin Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.28B
5Y Perf.+139.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OLN vs TROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
Chemicals
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.+52.6%
OLN vs TROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OLN | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $3.28B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.78B | $2.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $-470M |
| Gross Margin | 7.4% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | -6.0% |
| Total Debt | $3.39B | $3.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $168M | $211M |
OLN vs TROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OLN
TROX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 239.4 | +139.4% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OLN vs TROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OLN leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Tronox Holdings plc is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Income Pick
OLN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.47, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -140.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Long-Run Compounder
TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 104.7% 10Y total return vs OLN's 67.4%
- Beta 2.37, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.46x
- 3.0% yield, vs OLN's 2.8%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OLN | 3.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% |
| Quality / Margins | OLN | -0.6% margin vs TROX's -16.2% |
| Stability / Safety | OLN | Beta 1.47 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TROX | 3.0% yield, vs OLN's 2.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TROX | +96.0% vs OLN's +44.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OLN | -0.6% ROA vs TROX's -7.6%, ROIC 1.7% vs -0.3% |
OLN vs TROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
OLN vs TROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOLNLAGGINGTROX
TROXTronox Holdings plc
1leads
OLNOlin Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TROXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OLN3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OLN9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TROX5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OLN and TROX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 2.3x TROX's $2.9B. OLN is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -16.2%. On growth, TROX holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $538M | $128M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | -$470M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $248M | -$281M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +9.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | -6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | -16.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.4% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.2% | -4.8% |
Evenly matched — OLN and TROX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OLN's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TROX's 17.8x.
| Metric | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.5B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -77.84x | -3.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.24x | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.23x | — |
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLN delivers a -2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-29 for TROX. OLN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLN scores 5/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -29.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | -0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.76x | 2.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $168M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | -1.42x |
OLN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OLN five years ago would be worth $7,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,214 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +96.0% total return vs OLN's +44.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TROX at -3.5% vs OLN's -17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.6% | +138.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +96.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.0% | -10.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.4% | -47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.4% | +104.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.1% | -3.5% |
TROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OLN and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLN is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.46 | $10.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.08 | $2.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 3.1M |
Evenly matched — OLN and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OLN and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OLN as "Hold" and TROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -15.5% upside for OLN (target: $24) vs -28.4% for TROX (target: $7). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.99% vs OLN's 2.78%.
| Metric | OLNOlin Corporation | TROXTronox Holdings p… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.33 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — OLN and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
OLN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TROX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallOlin Corporation (OLN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OLN vs TROX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OLN or TROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Analysts rate Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OLN or TROX?
Over the past 5 years, Olin Corporation (OLN) delivered a total return of -29.
4%, compared to -47. 9% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TROX returned +104. 7% versus OLN's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OLN or TROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Olin Corporation (OLN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
47β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 61% more volatile than OLN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Olin Corporation (OLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 176% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OLN or TROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olin Corporation grew EPS -140. 7% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, TROX leads at -5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OLN or TROX?
Olin Corporation (OLN) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
6% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps -0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLN leads at 1. 7% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TROX leads at 9. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OLN or TROX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 8% for Olin Corporation (OLN).
07Is OLN or TROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.
8% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLN: +67. 4%, TROX: +104. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OLN and TROX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OLN: -0.4% · TROX: 8.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.