Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ON vs MPWR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$40.44B
5Y Perf.+525.8%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$78.63B
5Y Perf.+663.2%

ON vs MPWR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ON logoON
MPWR logoMPWR
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$40.44B$78.63B
Revenue (TTM)$6.06B$2.79B
Net Income (TTM)$574M$616M
Gross Margin37.2%55.2%
Operating Margin10.8%26.1%
Forward P/E33.7x67.2x
Total Debt$3.47B$24M
Cash & Equiv.$2.15B$1.10B

ON vs MPWRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ON
MPWR
StockMay 20May 26Return
ON Semiconductor Co… (ON)100625.8+525.8%
Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR)100763.2+663.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ON vs MPWR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MPWR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ON Semiconductor Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation
The Income Pick

ON is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.91
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 4.52x
  • Beta 1.91, current ratio 4.52x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
  • 25.3% 10Y total return vs ON's 10.3%
  • 26.4% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMPWR logoMPWR26.4% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3%
ValueON logoONLower P/E (33.7x vs 67.2x)
Quality / MarginsMPWR logoMPWR22.1% margin vs ON's 9.5%
Stability / SafetyON logoONBeta 1.91 vs MPWR's 2.27
DividendsMPWR logoMPWR0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ON logoON+159.5% vs MPWR's +151.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MPWR logoMPWR15.2% ROA vs ON's 4.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs 6.1%

ON vs MPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ONON Semiconductor Corporation
FY 2025
Power Solutions Group
75.1%$2.8B
Intelligent Sensing Group
24.9%$928M
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.
FY 2023
DC To DC Products
94.4%$1.7B
Lighting Control Products
5.6%$102M

ON vs MPWR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPWRLAGGINGON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ON is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 2.2x MPWR's $2.8B. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ON's 9.5%. On growth, MPWR holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricON logoONON Semiconductor …MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.1B$2.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$781M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$574M$616M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.5B$664M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.2%+55.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.8%+26.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.5%+22.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.0%+23.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.7%+20.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.0%-88.4%
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 125.6x trailing earnings, MPWR trades at a 65% valuation discount to ON's 355.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ON's 29.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 99.5x.

MetricON logoONON Semiconductor …MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Market CapShares × price$40.4B$78.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41.8B$77.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS355.85x125.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.33.68x67.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.13x99.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.75x28.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.52x21.90x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.51x118.03x
ON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MPWR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for ON. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ON's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPWR scores 6/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricON logoONON Semiconductor …MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.5%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.1%+22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.2%+20.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.45x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.1B$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.5B$24M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.49x
MPWR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $50,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,876 for ON. Over the past 12 months, ON leads with a +159.5% total return vs MPWR's +151.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.9% vs ON's 8.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricON logoONON Semiconductor …MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+82.0%+71.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+159.5%+151.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.2%+286.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+178.8%+404.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1032.8%+2534.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.6%+56.9%
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ON is the less volatile stock with a 1.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPWR's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricON logoONON Semiconductor …MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.91x2.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$105.88$1662.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$38.69$630.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.5%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.661.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.3M578K
ON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates ON as "Buy" and MPWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.9% upside for MPWR (target: $1615) vs -8.7% for ON (target: $94). MPWR is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricON logoONON Semiconductor …MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$94.25$1615.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts4625
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises08
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.4%+0.0%
MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MPWR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ON leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallMonolithic Power Systems, I… (MPWR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ON vs MPWR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ON or MPWR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) offers the better valuation at 125. 6x trailing P/E (67. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ON or MPWR?

On trailing P/E, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the cheapest at 125. 6x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 355. 9x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 33. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ON or MPWR?

Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) delivered a total return of +404. 2%, compared to +178. 8% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +25. 3% versus ON's +1033%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ON or MPWR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

91β versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning MPWR is approximately 19% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ON or MPWR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. grew EPS -65. 2% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ON or MPWR?

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 2. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus 12. 5% for ON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ON or MPWR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 33.

7x forward P/E versus 67. 2x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MPWR: 0. 9% to $1615. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ON or MPWR?

In this comparison, MPWR (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. ON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ON or MPWR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1033% 10Y return).

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1033%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ON and MPWR?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPWR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ON and MPWR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ON: 4.7% · MPWR: 20.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ON: 9.5% · MPWR: 22.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ON: 355.9x · MPWR: 125.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.