Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ONC
BeOne Medicines Ltd.

Medical - Pharmaceuticals

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$33.87B
5Y Perf.+31.2%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.91B
5Y Perf.+165.3%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.+4.2%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.-19.8%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.98B
5Y Perf.-16.9%

ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ONC logoONC
KYMR logoKYMR
RCUS logoRCUS
IMVT logoIMVT
CRL logoCRL
IndustryMedical - PharmaceuticalsBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$33.87B$6.91B$2.50B$5.53B$8.98B
Revenue (TTM)$5.74B$51M$236M$0.00$4.03B
Net Income (TTM)$513M$-315M$-369M$-464M$-185M
Gross Margin88.3%33.2%90.7%24.9%
Operating Margin12.0%-7.0%-168.6%11.8%
Forward P/E51.9x16.4x
Total Debt$2.00B$82M$99M$98K$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$4.55B$357M$222M$714M$214M

ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ONC
KYMR
RCUS
IMVT
CRL
StockAug 20May 26Return
BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC)100131.2+31.2%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100265.3+165.3%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100104.2+4.2%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10080.2-19.8%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10083.1-16.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ONC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Arcus Biosciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. CRL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ONC
BeOne Medicines Ltd.
The Income Pick

ONC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.70
  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 55.7%
  • 10.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +209.6% vs CRL's +32.8%
Best for: momentum
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Value Play

CRL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthONC logoONC40.2% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
ValueCRL logoCRLBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsONC logoONC8.9% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyONC logoONCBeta 0.70 vs RCUS's 1.95
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+209.6% vs CRL's +32.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ONC logoONC6.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%

ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ONCBeOne Medicines Ltd.
FY 2025
Product
99.1%$6.7B
Collaboration
0.9%$61M
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M

ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLONCLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ONC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ONC and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $5.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. ONC is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricONC logoONCBeOne Medicines L…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.7B$51M$236M$0$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$948M-$352M-$391M-$487M$757M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$513M-$315M-$369M-$464M-$185M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$846M-$244M-$489M-$423M$391M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+88.3%+33.2%+90.7%+24.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.0%-7.0%-168.6%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.9%-6.1%-156.4%-4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.7%-4.7%-2.1%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.5%+55.5%-39.3%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2547.0%+13.4%+10.5%+19.7%-160.0%
ONC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONC's 53.2x.

MetricONC logoONCBeOne Medicines L…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Market CapShares × price$33.9B$6.9B$2.5B$5.5B$9.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$31.3B$6.6B$2.4B$4.8B$11.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.64x-22.93x-7.54x-9.97x-62.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.51.91x16.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple53.20x12.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.34x176.26x10.11x2.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.25x4.52x4.22x5.83x2.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF35.97x17.31x
CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ONC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ONC delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONC scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricONC logoONCBeOne Medicines L…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%-25.0%-69.0%-47.1%-5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.7%-22.3%-35.3%-44.1%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.6%-24.9%-64.1%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.9%-27.2%-42.1%-66.1%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974024
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.46x0.05x0.16x0.00x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.5B-$275M-$123M-$714M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.5B$357M$222M$714M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.0B$82M$99M$98,000$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.46x-2119.53x-13.38x6.38x
ONC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs CRL's +32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs CRL's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricONC logoONCBeOne Medicines L…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.9%+16.3%+6.5%+5.1%-10.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+36.5%+190.7%+209.6%+96.1%+32.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+24.8%+205.1%+24.9%+40.9%-4.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.6%+92.1%-18.6%+62.4%-46.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1045.6%+154.4%+45.9%+173.6%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.7%+45.0%+7.7%+12.1%-1.4%
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ONC and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ONC is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CRL's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricONC logoONCBeOne Medicines L…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x1.15x1.95x1.37x1.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$385.22$103.00$28.72$30.09$228.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$218.31$28.06$7.06$13.36$131.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.3%+82.2%+86.3%+90.5%+79.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.754.160.560.257.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded237K602K1.2M1.4M806K
Evenly matched — ONC and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ONC as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).

MetricONC logoONCBeOne Medicines L…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$401.29$117.06$30.00$45.50$205.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts1326182336
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ONC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ONC vs KYMR vs RCUS vs IMVT vs CRL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BeOne Medicines Ltd.

(ONC) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (51. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BeOne Medicines Ltd. (ONC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL?

On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL?

Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -46. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONC returned +1046% versus RCUS's +45. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BeOne Medicines Ltd.

(ONC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 180% more volatile than ONC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BeOne Medicines Ltd.

(ONC) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BeOne Medicines Ltd. grew EPS 637. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONC leads at 55. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL?

BeOne Medicines Ltd.

(ONC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 51. 9x for BeOne Medicines Ltd. — 35. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67. 2% to $45. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ONC or KYMR or RCUS or IMVT or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BeOne Medicines Ltd.

(ONC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), +1046% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONC: +1046%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ONC and KYMR and RCUS and IMVT and CRL?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ONC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ONC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KYMR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ONC and KYMR and RCUS and IMVT and CRL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ONC: 35.5% · KYMR: 55.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.