Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $13.63B | $3.92B | $2.47B | $3.63B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.03B | $901M | $959M | $2.07B | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $106M | $94M | $-51M | $-194M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 44.4% | 11.3% | 15.6% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 12.1% | -3.8% | -5.3% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 38.7x | 29.7x | 62.2x | 34.4x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $303M | $186M | $810M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $346M | $766M | $98M | $312M | $675M |
ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 297.0 | +197.0% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
| Ultra Clean Holding… (UCTT) | 100 | 385.4 | +285.4% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 5.79x
- 4.7% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.6%
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
- PEG 0.84 vs ONTO's 1.12
- 15.2% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1%
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +329.1% vs ONTO's +118.9%
Among these 5 stocks, UCTT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Beta 2.64 vs ICHR's 3.93
- 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.7x vs 34.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs UCTT's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.64 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs ONTO's +118.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.6% |
ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MKSI leads 1 • ONTO leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • UCTT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 4.5x ACMR's $901M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UCTT's -9.4%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $901M | $959M | $2.1B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $158M | $126M | -$11M | -$52M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $106M | $94M | -$51M | -$194M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $239M | -$69M | -$17M | -$44M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +44.4% | +11.3% | +15.6% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +12.1% | -3.8% | -5.3% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +10.4% | -5.3% | -9.4% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | -7.6% | -1.7% | -2.1% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | +9.4% | +4.7% | +2.9% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.5% | -76.1% | +46.2% | -2.6% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 56% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs ONTO's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.6B | $3.9B | $2.5B | $3.6B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $3.5B | $2.6B | $4.1B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 98.57x | 43.21x | -46.25x | -19.98x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.74x | 29.68x | 62.25x | 34.44x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.85x | 1.22x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 68.79x | 27.49x | — | 34.53x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.56x | 4.35x | 2.61x | 1.77x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.43x | 2.06x | 3.67x | 4.62x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.47x | — | — | 247.26x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ONTO and ACMR and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-25 for UCTT. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +6.1% | -7.5% | -25.4% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +3.9% | -5.2% | -11.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +7.0% | -3.9% | +2.6% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +6.6% | -4.7% | +2.9% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.28x | 1.03x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$329M | -$463M | $87M | $499M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $346M | $766M | $98M | $312M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $303M | $186M | $810M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 20.44x | -5.97x | -5.80x | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs ONTO's +118.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs ICHR's 35.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.2% | +31.9% | +249.0% | +192.5% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +118.9% | +195.6% | +329.1% | +312.7% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.0% | +487.9% | +151.1% | +187.5% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +312.6% | +133.4% | +28.9% | +59.4% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1431.7% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | +1385.1% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.1% | +80.5% | +35.9% | +42.2% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKSI is the less volatile stock with a 2.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ACMR's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 3.24x | 3.93x | 3.19x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $315.86 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $87.68 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $85.88 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $18.52 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +91.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 62.3 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 832K | 1.2M | 795K | 1.3M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ONTO as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", UCTT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $308.33 | $40.00 | $49.80 | $85.00 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 10 | 14 | 12 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.2% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MKSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
ONTO vs ACMR vs ICHR vs UCTT vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +28. 9% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus ICHR's +629. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 64β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 49% more volatile than MKSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -869. 2% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -8. 8% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ONTO, ICHR, UCTT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ONTO or ACMR or ICHR or UCTT or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONTO and ACMR and ICHR and UCTT and MKSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UCTT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.