OPAL vs REX

For growth investors, OPAL Fuels Inc.

(OPAL) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation (REX). OPAL Fuels Inc. (OPAL) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate REX American Resources Corporation (REX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, OPAL Fuels Inc.

(OPAL) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus REX American Resources Corporation at 29. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +250.

0%, compared to -76. 1% for OPAL Fuels Inc. (OPAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +464. 7% versus OPAL's -76. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

36β versus OPAL Fuels Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning OPAL is approximately 334% more volatile than REX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 73% for OPAL Fuels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), OPAL Fuels Inc.

(OPAL) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -22. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation (REX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPAL Fuels Inc. grew EPS 638. 9% year-over-year, compared to -4. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPAL leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

1% net margin versus 1. 2% for OPAL Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REX leads at 10. 0% versus 1. 4% for OPAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OPAL leads at 24. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, OPAL (15.

3% yield) pays a dividend. REX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

36), +464. 7% 10Y return). OPAL Fuels Inc. (OPAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REX: +464. 7%, OPAL: -76. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (OPAL (Utilities) and REX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OPAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OPAL pays a dividend while REX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.