OPRA vs IAC

For growth investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger pick with 28.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Opera Limited (OPRA) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Opera Limited is actually cheaper at 16.

1x.

Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +110.

8%, compared to -67. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus OPRA's +70. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IAC InterActive Corp.

(IAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Opera Limited's 1. 57β — meaning OPRA is approximately 43% more volatile than IAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for IAC InterActive Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opera Limited (OPRA) is pulling ahead at 28.

3% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 32. 2% for Opera Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRA leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Opera Limited (OPRA) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

6% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRA leads at 15. 0% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAC leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Opera Limited (OPRA) trades at 16.

1x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 93. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRA: 14. 6% to $21. 50.

In this comparison, OPRA (4.

2% yield) pays a dividend. IAC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, IAC InterActive Corp.

(IAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), +347. 8% 10Y return). Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAC: +347. 8%, OPRA: +70. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (OPRA (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OPRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OPRA pays a dividend while IAC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.