Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $124M | $3.01B | $113M | $5.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $109M | $2.25B | $311M | $638M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $3.08B | $-178M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 67.3% | 7.0% | 48.7% | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 1.6% | -51.7% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 68.5x | 14.1x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $10M | $20M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $480M | $51M | $210M |
OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 10.7 | -89.3% |
| Privia Health Group… (PRVA) | 100 | 54.1 | -45.9% |
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.8x)
PRVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 63.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 4.3% 10Y total return vs OPRX's 110.5%
- 22.3% revenue growth vs HCAT's 1.5%
- 137.2% margin vs HCAT's -57.2%
HCAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 6.97x
- Beta 1.03 vs OPRX's 2.28, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% revenue growth vs HCAT's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 137.2% margin vs HCAT's -57.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs OPRX's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.9% vs HCAT's -59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 20.0% vs -32.9% |
OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRVA leads 1 • OPRX leads 0 • HCAT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 20.5x OPRX's $109M. PRVA is the more profitable business, keeping 137.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCAT's -57.2%. On growth, PRVA holds the edge at +25.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $109M | $2.2B | $311M | $638M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $48M | -$110M | $250M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $3.1B | -$178M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | -$49.3B | -$5M | $314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.3% | +7.0% | +48.7% | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +1.6% | -51.7% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +137.2% | -57.2% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | -21.9% | -1.5% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +25.8% | -6.2% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -33.3% | -2.9% | -16.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OPRX and HCAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 82% valuation discount to PRVA's 133.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRVA's 57.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $3.0B | $113M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $105M | $2.5B | $82M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.56x | 133.28x | -0.62x | 23.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.04x | 68.48x | 14.15x | 16.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.55x | 57.62x | — | 21.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 1.42x | 0.36x | 9.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 3.91x | 0.45x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.62x | 18.58x | — | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-55 for HCAT. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCAT's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs PRVA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +1.5% | -54.7% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +0.9% | -27.4% | +20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +9.9% | -32.9% | +20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +4.6% | -34.0% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.01x | 0.08x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$470M | -$31M | -$197M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $480M | $51M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $10M | $20M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.26x | — | -4.79x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRVA five years ago would be worth $7,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for HCAT. Over the past 12 months, PRVA leads with a +2.9% total return vs HCAT's -59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRVA at -7.1% vs HCAT's -49.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.6% | +2.3% | -30.3% | -39.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.1% | +2.9% | -59.9% | -55.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | -19.8% | -86.9% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -26.1% | -97.0% | -50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.5% | +4.3% | -95.9% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.0% | -7.1% | -49.2% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRVA and DOCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOCS is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRVA currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs OPRX's 29.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 1.03x | 2.05x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.25 | $26.51 | $5.06 | $76.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.54 | $18.77 | $0.96 | $20.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.8% | +90.5% | +31.4% | +34.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 55.6 | 63.9 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 476K | 901K | 720K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPRX as "Buy", PRVA as "Buy", HCAT as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 32.0% for PRVA (target: $32).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $31.67 | $2.50 | $42.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +2.3% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRVA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
OPRX vs PRVA vs HCAT vs DOCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Privia Health Group, Inc. at 133. 3x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS?
Over the past 5 years, Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) delivered a total return of -26. 1%, compared to -97. 0% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +110. 5% versus HCAT's -95. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning OPRX is approximately 122% more volatile than DOCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 1. 5% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -121. 7% for Health Catalyst, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPRX leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -57. 2% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 68. 5x for Privia Health Group, Inc. — 61. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OPRX or PRVA or HCAT or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRVA: +4. 3%, HCAT: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPRX and PRVA and HCAT and DOCS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.