Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $566M | $898M | $8.71B | $539M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.59B | $266M | $12.12B | $8.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.87B | $-36M | $-1.74B | $-1.87B |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 37.9% | 35.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | -10.3% | -2.6% | -1.3% |
| Total Debt | $26.46B | $642M | $17.71B | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.12B | $27M | $1.00B | $1.01B |
OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimum Communicati… (OPTU) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS) | 100 | 6.4 | -93.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPTU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SHEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 21.6% 10Y total return vs LUMN's -35.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 66.2%, current ratio 0.90x
LUMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +100.0% vs OPTU's -54.3%
ATUS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.7% margin vs ATUS's -21.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs OPTU's -54.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.0% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC -1.1% vs -0.8% |
OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPTU leads 1 • ATUS leads 1 • LUMN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPTU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 45.5x SHEN's $266M. SHEN is the more profitable business, keeping -13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATUS's -21.8%. On growth, OPTU holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.6B | $266M | $12.1B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $104M | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.9B | -$36M | -$1.7B | -$1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$119M | -$276M | $5.4B | $163M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +37.9% | +35.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -10.3% | -2.6% | -1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -13.7% | -14.3% | -21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -103.5% | +44.9% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -100.0% | -8.9% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -18.2% | 0.0% | -25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATUS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATUS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHEN's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $566M | $898M | $8.7B | $539M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.9B | $1.5B | $25.4B | $25.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.30x | -22.86x | -4.83x | -8.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.92x | 13.80x | 9.91x | 7.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 2.51x | 0.70x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.92x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 23.49x | 3.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OPTU and ATUS each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHEN delivers a -3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATUS scores 5/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.7% | -79.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.0% | -2.0% | -5.3% | -156.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | -1.1% | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | -1.3% | -0.6% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.66x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $25.3B | $614M | $16.7B | -$762M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $27M | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26.5B | $642M | $17.7B | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.88x | -0.65x | -1.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SHEN and LUMN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHEN five years ago would be worth $7,209 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $326 for OPTU. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs OPTU's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs OPTU's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.7% | +43.5% | +10.0% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | +41.3% | +100.0% | -28.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | -13.6% | +267.8% | -37.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | -27.9% | -28.8% | -94.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +21.6% | -35.7% | -88.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.1% | -4.8% | +54.4% | -14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs OPTU's 40.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.89x | 2.74x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.98 | $17.34 | $11.95 | $2.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.14 | $9.66 | $3.37 | $1.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.6% | +93.6% | +70.8% | +63.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 55.2 | 73.4 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 300K | 12.5M | 956K |
Analyst Outlook
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPTU as "Hold", SHEN as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold", ATUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $29.00 | $7.08 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 8 | 28 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SHEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). OPTU leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
OPTU vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ATUS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS?
Over the past 5 years, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) delivered a total return of -27.
9%, compared to -96. 7% for Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEN returned +21. 6% versus OPTU's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 210% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shenandoah Telecommunications Company grew EPS -120. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS?
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the more profitable company, earning -11.
0% net margin versus -21. 8% for Altice USA, Inc. — meaning it keeps -11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPTU leads at 18. 3% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATUS leads at 51. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. OPTU, LUMN, ATUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is OPTU or SHEN or LUMN or ATUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 7% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 6%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OPTU and SHEN and LUMN and ATUS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SHEN pays a dividend while OPTU, LUMN, ATUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.