ORA
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Renewable Utilities
Market Cap$7.52B
5Y Perf.+68.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ORA vs BEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
Renewable Utilities
Market Cap$10.57B
5Y Perf.+32.6%
ORA vs BEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ORA | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $7.52B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $6.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $128M | $212M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 53.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.86B | $35.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $281M | $2.31B |
ORA vs BEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ORA
BEP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ormat Technologies,… (ORA) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORA vs BEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ORA leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ORA
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
ORA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.77, yield 0.4%, current ratio 0.81x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
The Income Pick
BEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 11.7%
- 199.1% 10Y total return vs ORA's 195.2%
- 11.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ORA's 0.4%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ORA | 12.5% revenue growth vs BEP's 10.9% |
| Quality / Margins | ORA | 11.0% margin vs BEP's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | ORA | Beta 0.77 vs BEP's 0.85 |
| Dividends | BEP | 11.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ORA's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ORA | +69.8% vs BEP's +60.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ORA | 2.0% ROA vs BEP's 0.2%, ROIC 2.7% vs 0.9% |
ORA vs BEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
ORA vs BEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLORALAGGINGBEP
BEPBrookfield Renewable …
2leads
ORAOrmat Technologies, I…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BEPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BEP4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ORA7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ORA4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
BEP2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ORA and BEP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 5.5x ORA's $1.2B. ORA is the more profitable business, keeping 11.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEP's 3.3%. On growth, ORA holds the edge at +75.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $301M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $128M | $212M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$305M | -$8.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.2% | -128.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.8% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | +25.3% |
Evenly matched — ORA and BEP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BEP leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BEP's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ORA's 21.5x.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $44.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 60.55x | -512.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.59x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 14.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.46x | 13.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.60x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 0.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
BEP leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $1 for BEP. BEP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORA's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEP scores 5/9 vs ORA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $281M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $35.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.75x | 1.04x |
ORA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORA five years ago would be worth $17,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,256 for BEP. Over the past 12 months, ORA leads with a +69.8% total return vs BEP's +60.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORA at 13.5% vs BEP's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | +60.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.4% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.2% | +199.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +7.3% |
ORA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ORA and BEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORA is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEP's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEP currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs ORA's 92.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $132.58 | $35.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.42 | $22.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 874K | 875K |
Evenly matched — ORA and BEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
BEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ORA as "Hold" and BEP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.9% upside for ORA (target: $132) vs 1.8% for BEP (target: $35). For income investors, BEP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.70% vs ORA's 0.39%.
| Metric | ORAOrmat Technologie… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.00 | $35.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | $4.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BEP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ORA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallOrmat Technologies, Inc. (ORA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ORA vs BEP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORA or BEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ormat Technologies, Inc.
(ORA) is the stronger pick with 12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) offers the better valuation at 60. 5x trailing P/E (53. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ORA or BEP?
Over the past 5 years, Ormat Technologies, Inc.
(ORA) delivered a total return of +79. 4%, compared to +12. 6% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEP returned +199. 1% versus ORA's +195. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ORA or BEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ormat Technologies, Inc.
(ORA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. 's 0. 85β — meaning BEP is approximately 10% more volatile than ORA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 106% for Ormat Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ORA or BEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ormat Technologies, Inc.
(ORA) is pulling ahead at 12. 5% versus 10. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. grew EPS 92. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 0% for Ormat Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEP leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ORA or BEP?
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
(ORA) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -0. 3% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORA leads at 18. 5% versus 13. 4% for BEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORA leads at 27. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ORA or BEP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORA: 7.
9% to $132. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ORA or BEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP) offers the highest yield at 11. 7%, versus 0. 4% for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA).
08Is ORA or BEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.
P. (BEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 11. 7% yield, +199. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEP: +199. 1%, ORA: +195. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ORA and BEP?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ORA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. BEP pays a dividend while ORA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ORA: 75.8% · BEP: 9.1%)Net Margin>
%
(ORA: 11.0% · BEP: 3.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.