Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ORBS vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
ORBS vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $168M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-262M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 1.6% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | -130.4% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $40M |
Quick Verdict: ORBS vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.47
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 13.61x
- Beta 1.47, current ratio 13.61x
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs ORBS's -43.6%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs ORBS's -16.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs ORBS's -16.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs ORBS's -7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.47 vs FLXS's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs ORBS's -43.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs ORBS's -149.3%, ROIC 9.9% vs -15.6% |
ORBS vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ORBS vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS is the larger business by revenue, generating $458M annually — 13.9x ORBS's $33M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ORBS's -7.9%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$262M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$72,892 | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -130.4% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.5% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.0% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ORBS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $168M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $118M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.10x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.22x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-178 for ORBS. ORBS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLXS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs ORBS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -178.1% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -149.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.6% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -18.4% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$50M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -67.74x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,637 for ORBS. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs ORBS's -43.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs ORBS's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.1% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.6% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.4% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ORBS and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ORBS's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.12 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.0% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.5M | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ORBS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ORBS vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORBS or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 8% for Eightco Holdings Inc. (ORBS). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ORBS or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -43. 6% for Eightco Holdings Inc. (ORBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus ORBS's -43. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ORBS or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eightco Holdings Inc.
(ORBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 3% more volatile than ORBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eightco Holdings Inc. (ORBS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 35% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ORBS or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -16. 8% for Eightco Holdings Inc. (ORBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1250. 0% for Eightco Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORBS leads at 1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ORBS or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Eightco Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus -70. 8% for ORBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLXS leads at 22. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ORBS or FLXS?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ORBS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ORBS or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLXS: +51. 4%, ORBS: -43. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ORBS and FLXS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORBS (Technology) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ORBS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS pays a dividend while ORBS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.