Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Information Technology Services
ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $307K | $1.04T | $57.36B | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 4.1% | 5.3% | -1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 44.8x | 15.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $196K | $67.09B | $5.59B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $28M |
ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORIENTAL RISE HOLDI… (ORIS) | 100 | 5.4 | -94.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 159.1 | +59.1% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 9.1% margin vs CLPS's -1.3%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs TGT's 99.5%
- Beta 0.12 vs ORIS's 1.22
TGT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +36.6% vs ORIS's -51.3%
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 15.2% revenue growth vs ORIS's -37.8%
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs ORIS's -37.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs CLPS's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs ORIS's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs ORIS's -51.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs -7.9% |
ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORIS leads in 3 of 6 categories
WMT leads 2 • TGT leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 29700.7x ORIS's $24M. ORIS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLPS's -1.3%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $42.8B | $8.7B | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $22.9B | $4.0B | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +3.3% | +3.8% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +2.2% | +2.8% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.7% | +35.1% | +23.7% | +75.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ORIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, ORIS trades at a 100% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGT's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $307,224 | $1.04T | $57.4B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$43M | $1.09T | $57.5B | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.13x | 47.69x | 15.49x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.77x | 15.66x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -13.33x | 24.85x | 7.26x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.10x | 24.97x | 20.23x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORIS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CLPS. ORIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ORIS scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +22.3% | +26.1% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +7.9% | +6.9% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +14.7% | +16.7% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +17.5% | +13.6% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$43M | $56.4B | $104M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $196,000 | $67.1B | $5.6B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.00x | 11.85x | 12.40x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $731 for ORIS. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs ORIS's -51.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs ORIS's -58.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.5% | +15.7% | +26.4% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.3% | +32.7% | +36.6% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | +160.5% | -11.0% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | +186.9% | -31.6% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | +499.5% | +99.5% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.2% | +37.6% | -3.8% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORIS's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs ORIS's 23.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.11x | 0.94x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.90 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.1% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 904K | 17.2M | 4.5M | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.4% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs -8.3% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.22 | $115.44 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +3.6% | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 22 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
ORIS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ORIS vs WMT vs TGT vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 8% for ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS). ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS?
On trailing P/E, ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) is the cheapest at 0.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -92. 7% for ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +501. 4% versus ORIS's -92. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd's 1. 10β — meaning ORIS is approximately 927% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.
2% versus -37. 8% for ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS?
ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -4. 3% for CLPS Incorporation — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORIS leads at 13. 9% versus -4. 0% for CLPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15.
7x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 4% to $137. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), TGT (3. 6% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ORIS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORIS or WMT or TGT or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, ORIS: -92. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORIS and WMT and TGT and CLPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORIS (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ORIS is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. WMT, TGT, CLPS pay a dividend while ORIS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.