OSRH
OSR Holdings, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-93.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OSRH vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-28.1%
OSRH vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OSRH | CLPS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3M | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | -1.4% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66K | $28M |
OSRH vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OSRH
CLPS
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH) | 100 | 6.1 | -93.9% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 71.9 | -28.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSRH vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CLPS leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OSRH
OSR Holdings, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, OSRH is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: healthcare exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -181.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- -78.5% 10Y total return vs OSRH's -93.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLPS | 15.2% revenue growth vs OSRH's -159.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CLPS | -1.3% margin vs OSRH's -8.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CLPS | Beta 0.27 vs OSRH's 1.90 |
| Dividends | CLPS | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLPS | -5.4% vs OSRH's -45.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CLPS | -3.2% ROA vs OSRH's -11.7%, ROIC -7.9% vs -19.1% |
OSRH vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
OSRH vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLPSLAGGINGOSRH
OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc.
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OSRHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CLPS5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLPS1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CLPS4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLPS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CLPS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 118.5x OSRH's $3M. CLPS is the more profitable business, keeping -1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OSRH's -8.2%.
| Metric | OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -149.0% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.4% | +75.8% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.28x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPS delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-15 for OSRH. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSRH scores 4/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.5% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.7% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.1% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.4% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66,135 | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -152.34x | — |
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $609 for OSRH. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs OSRH's -45.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs OSRH's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.6% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.7% | +0.2% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSRH's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs OSRH's 38.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.79 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.6% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.3M | 15K |
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | OSRHOSR Holdings, Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CLPS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Best OverallCLPS Incorporation (CLPS)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OSRH vs CLPS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — OSRH or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -69.
3%, compared to -93. 9% for OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 5% versus OSRH's -93. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — OSRH or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus OSR Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning OSRH is approximately 601% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — OSRH or CLPS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CLPS Incorporation grew EPS -181.
4% year-over-year, compared to -852. 1% for OSR Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — OSRH or CLPS?
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
3% net margin versus -822. 6% for OSR Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPS leads at -4. 0% versus -558. 3% for OSRH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPS leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — OSRH or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. OSRH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is OSRH or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, OSRH: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between OSRH and CLPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSRH (Healthcare) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSRH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while OSRH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.