Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OUST vs LAZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
OUST vs LAZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $1.87B | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $76M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $-234M |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | -21.3% |
| Operating Margin | -37.4% | -332.8% |
| Total Debt | $17M | $535M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $83M |
OUST vs LAZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OUST vs LAZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OUST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 52.5%, EPS growth 48.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.4%
- -69.7% 10Y total return vs LAZR's -100.0%
- 52.5% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0%
LAZR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.40
- Lower volatility, beta 2.40, current ratio 4.05x
- Beta 2.40, current ratio 4.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.5% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -30.1% margin vs LAZR's -308.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.40 vs OUST's 3.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +267.0% vs LAZR's -98.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.9% ROA vs LAZR's -81.0%, ROIC -30.2% vs -123.6% |
OUST vs LAZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OUST vs LAZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUST is the larger business by revenue, generating $185M annually — 2.4x LAZR's $76M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -30.1% (OUST) to -3.1% (LAZR). On growth, OUST holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $76M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60M | -$229M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | -$234M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.0% | -21.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.4% | -3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.1% | -3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.4% | -2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | +21.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OUST and LAZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $454M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.47x | -0.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.05x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.33x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OUST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OUST scores 6/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.9% | -81.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.2% | -123.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.1% | -118.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$50M | $452M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $535M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OUST five years ago would be worth $2,702 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +267.0% total return vs LAZR's -98.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 87.5% vs LAZR's -91.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.8% | -24.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +267.0% | -98.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +559.1% | -99.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.0% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.7% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +87.5% | -91.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OUST and LAZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAZR is the less volatile stock with a 2.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OUST's 3.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OUST currently trades 70.6% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.51x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.65 | $4.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.65 | $0.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.6% | +1.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 36.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 418K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OUST leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
OUST vs LAZR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OUST or LAZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is the stronger pick with 52. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Analysts rate Ouster, Inc. (OUST) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OUST or LAZR?
Over the past 5 years, Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) delivered a total return of -73. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OUST returned -69. 7% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OUST or LAZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Luminar Technologies, Inc.
(LAZR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 40β versus Ouster, Inc. 's 3. 51β — meaning OUST is approximately 46% more volatile than LAZR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — OUST or LAZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is pulling ahead at 52. 5% versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Luminar Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 60. 5% year-over-year, compared to 48. 6% for Ouster, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OUST leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OUST or LAZR?
Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is the more profitable company, earning -35. 6% net margin versus -362. 3% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -35. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OUST leads at -43. 7% versus -577. 0% for LAZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OUST leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OUST or LAZR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OUST or LAZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OUST: -69. 7%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OUST and LAZR?
These companies operate in different sectors (OUST (Technology) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.