Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $14.76B | $53.57B | $28.19B | $6.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.79B | $15.19B | $12.24B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.24B | $403M | $2.15B | $483M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 41.8% | 21.8% | 102.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 22.1% | 18.9% | 26.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 10.7x | 8.6x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $7.53B | $14.49B | $8.78B | $3.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $106M | $1.43B | $79M |
OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | 100 | 758.0 | +658.0% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 447.3 | +347.3% |
| Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN) | 100 | 419.6 | +319.6% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 708.8 | +608.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OVV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.7x)
- +75.7% vs MTDR's +42.2%
FANG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 162.5% 10Y total return vs MTDR's 201.8%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs OVV's -4.5%
DVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.05, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.98x
- 17.6% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
- Beta 0.05 vs OVV's 0.22, lower leverage
MTDR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.4%
- 2.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs OVV's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs OVV's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs FANG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs OVV's 0.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs OVV's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.7% vs MTDR's +42.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 12.3% vs 6.7% |
OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTDR leads in 2 of 6 categories
DVN leads 1 • OVV leads 1 • FANG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OVV and MTDR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 4.5x MTDR's $3.4B. DVN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, FANG holds the edge at +5.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.8B | $15.2B | $12.2B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $8.6B | $5.0B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $403M | $2.1B | $483M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.6B | $1.6B | $2.1B | $518M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +41.8% | +21.8% | +102.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +22.1% | +18.9% | +26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +2.7% | +17.6% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +10.5% | +16.8% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +5.2% | -99.9% | -33.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.8% | -98.3% | -100.0% | -115.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MTDR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, MTDR trades at a 73% valuation discount to FANG's 33.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTDR's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $53.6B | $28.2B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.3B | $68.0B | $35.5B | $10.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.19x | 33.24x | 10.80x | 9.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.51x | 10.68x | 8.62x | 7.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.43x | 6.83x | 4.79x | 4.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.69x | 3.57x | 1.65x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.28x | 1.84x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.81x | 10.23x | 9.04x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DVN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for FANG. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OVV's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OVV scores 6/9 vs MTDR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +0.9% | +18.6% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +0.6% | +9.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +6.7% | +12.3% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.1% | +7.6% | +13.8% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.34x | 0.57x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.5B | $14.4B | $7.3B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $106M | $1.4B | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $14.5B | $8.8B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.06x | 0.66x | 7.98x | 7.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OVV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $26,372 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,548 for MTDR. Over the past 12 months, OVV leads with a +75.7% total return vs MTDR's +42.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OVV at 21.0% vs DVN's -0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.7% | +25.7% | +20.4% | +29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.7% | +50.1% | +52.9% | +42.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.0% | +57.5% | -2.0% | +29.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.7% | +163.7% | +120.1% | +105.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.6% | +162.5% | +99.0% | +201.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.0% | +16.3% | -0.7% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OVV and DVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OVV's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OVV currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs MTDR's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.09x | 0.05x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.46 | $214.51 | $52.71 | $66.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.26 | $127.75 | $29.70 | $37.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +88.8% | +86.0% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 49.7 | 43.5 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 3.4M | 15.3M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MTDR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OVV as "Buy", FANG as "Buy", DVN as "Buy", MTDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.9% upside for MTDR (target: $68) vs -3.6% for OVV (target: $56). For income investors, MTDR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.36% vs OVV's 2.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.20 | $201.27 | $53.78 | $68.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 51 | 64 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $4.00 | $0.98 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +3.8% | +3.7% | +0.8% |
MTDR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). DVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
OVV vs FANG vs DVN vs MTDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV). Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR?
On trailing P/E, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 33. 2x. On forward P/E, Ovintiv Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) delivered a total return of +163. 7%, compared to +105. 5% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +201. 8% versus DVN's +99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Ovintiv Inc. 's 0. 22β — meaning OVV is approximately 311% more volatile than DVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 67% for Ovintiv Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -4. 5% for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ovintiv Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR?
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
8% net margin versus 11. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 21. 6% for OVV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ovintiv Inc.
(OVV) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTDR: 22. 9% to $68. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV).
09Is OVV or FANG or DVN or MTDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 2. 4% yield, +201. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +201. 8%, OVV: +118. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OVV and FANG and DVN and MTDR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OVV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.