Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OZ vs IIPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
OZ vs IIPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $185M | $1.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $120M |
| Gross Margin | -73.7% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -201.6% | 46.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $181M | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $48M |
OZ vs IIPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 69.3 | -30.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZ vs IIPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.31
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 59.5%, current ratio 0.70x
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 442.0% 10Y total return vs OZ's -49.2%
- 45.6% margin vs OZ's -5.1%
- 13.2% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs OZ's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs IIPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 13.2% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.2% vs OZ's -17.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs OZ's -6.4%, ROIC 4.3% vs -2.6% |
OZ vs IIPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIPR is the larger business by revenue, generating $263M annually — 36.5x OZ's $7M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OZ's -5.1%. On growth, OZ holds the edge at +177.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $144M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -73.7% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +54.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +177.0% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.6% | -1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OZ leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $185M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.74x | 14.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.13x | 6.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-13 for OZ. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OZ's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIPR scores 4/9 vs OZ's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | $346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $181M | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.35x | 6.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IIPR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IIPR five years ago would be worth $5,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,096 for OZ. Over the past 12 months, IIPR leads with a +23.2% total return vs OZ's -17.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIPR at 5.0% vs OZ's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.5% | +20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.8% | +23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +15.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -48.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.2% | +442.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OZ and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs OZ's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.00 | $61.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.50 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.7% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 67.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 309K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
IIPR is the only dividend payer here at 13.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
IIPR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OZ vs IIPR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZ or IIPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) is the stronger pick with 18.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OZ or IIPR?
Over the past 5 years, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) delivered a total return of -48. 2%, compared to -49. 0% for Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus OZ's -49. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OZ or IIPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIPR is approximately 193% more volatile than OZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 59% for Belpointe PREP, LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OZ or IIPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) is pulling ahead at 18.
7% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. grew EPS -28. 8% year-over-year, compared to -62. 6% for Belpointe PREP, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, OZ leads at 39. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OZ or IIPR?
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -891. 8% for Belpointe PREP, LLC — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus -504. 3% for OZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OZ or IIPR?
In this comparison, IIPR (13.
2% yield) pays a dividend. OZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is OZ or IIPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 13. 2% yield, +436. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIPR: +436. 4%, OZ: -49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OZ and IIPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock. IIPR pays a dividend while OZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.