Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OZ vs STRW vs GMRE vs GOOD vs NTST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
OZ vs STRW vs GMRE vs GOOD vs NTST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $185M | $170M | $94M | $616M | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $145M | $148M | $166M | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $7M | $2M | $21M | $185K |
| Gross Margin | -73.7% | 81.4% | 68.8% | -11.7% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | -201.6% | 54.3% | 24.9% | 27.9% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.4x | 595.7x | 83.0x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $181M | $672M | $654M | $856M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $48M | $7M | $11M | $14M |
OZ vs STRW vs GMRE vs GOOD vs NTST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) | 100 | 60.1 | -39.9% |
| Strawberry Fields R… (STRW) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| Global Medical REIT… (GMRE) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.7% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 114.3 | +14.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZ vs STRW vs GMRE vs GOOD vs NTST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZ is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 59.5%, current ratio 0.70x
STRW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 47.8% 10Y total return vs GMRE's 308.1%
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 83.0x)
GMRE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 63.5%
- 63.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
GOOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.55, yield 11.4%, current ratio 1.63x
- 12.7% margin vs OZ's -5.1%
- 1.7% ROA vs OZ's -6.4%, ROIC 4.4% vs -2.6%
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- PEG 1.11 vs GOOD's 2.34
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs GMRE's -1.8%
- Beta 0.05 vs STRW's 0.69
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs GMRE's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 83.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs OZ's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs STRW's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 63.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs OZ's -19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs OZ's -6.4%, ROIC 4.4% vs -2.6% |
OZ vs STRW vs GMRE vs GOOD vs NTST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRW leads in 3 of 6 categories
NTST leads 1 • GMRE leads 1 • OZ leads 0 • GOOD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STRW and GOOD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST is the larger business by revenue, generating $176M annually — 24.5x OZ's $7M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OZ's -5.1%. On growth, OZ holds the edge at +177.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $145M | $148M | $166M | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $123M | $95M | $106M | $133M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $7M | $2M | $21M | $185,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $88M | $19M | $90M | $106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -73.7% | +81.4% | +68.8% | -11.7% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +54.3% | +24.9% | +27.9% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +4.8% | +1.7% | +12.7% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +60.7% | +12.6% | +54.1% | +59.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +177.0% | +34.8% | +18.7% | +11.8% | +27.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.6% | +6.7% | -166.2% | +2.8% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 91% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs NTST's 4.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $185M | $170M | $94M | $616M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $793M | $741M | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.73x | 22.72x | 115.29x | 31.02x | 254.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.44x | 595.67x | 82.97x | 64.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.88x | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.31x | 8.35x | 12.36x | 12.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.05x | 1.45x | 0.68x | 3.82x | 8.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 1.10x | 0.17x | 1.76x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.81x | — | 9.17x | 15.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-13 for OZ. OZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs OZ's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.9% | +11.2% | +0.5% | +9.7% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +1.7% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +7.2% | +2.0% | +4.4% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | +9.0% | +5.3% | +5.3% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 8.04x | 1.18x | 2.50x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | $623M | $647M | $846M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $48M | $7M | $11M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $181M | $672M | $654M | $856M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.35x | 1.82x | 1.14x | 1.46x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRW five years ago would be worth $14,780 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,074 for OZ. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +32.6% total return vs OZ's -19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRW at 27.9% vs OZ's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | +1.0% | +6.9% | +21.6% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.5% | +29.7% | +0.1% | +0.7% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +109.3% | +5.6% | +43.8% | +27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +47.8% | -21.4% | -9.7% | +14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.2% | +47.8% | +308.1% | +51.0% | +40.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +27.9% | +1.8% | +12.9% | +8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRW's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs OZ's 73.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.69x | 0.48x | 0.55x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.00 | $14.00 | $39.93 | $15.03 | $21.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.50 | $9.46 | $29.05 | $10.33 | $15.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.6% | +92.5% | +89.5% | +84.6% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 51.6 | 52.7 | 49.1 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 23K | 130K | 390K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
GMRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRW as "Buy", GMRE as "Buy", GOOD as "Buy", NTST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs 2.2% for GOOD (target: $13). For income investors, GMRE offers the higher dividend yield at 63.51% vs NTST's 4.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.33 | $40.00 | $13.00 | $22.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 22 | 14 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.4% | +63.5% | +11.4% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.57 | $22.70 | $1.44 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.0% |
STRW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NTST leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
OZ vs STRW vs GMRE vs GOOD vs NTST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for Global Medical REIT Inc. (GMRE). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST?
On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 2. 34x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST?
Over the past 5 years, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) delivered a total return of +47.
8%, compared to -49. 3% for Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GMRE returned +308. 1% versus OZ's -49. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Strawberry Fields REIT LLC's 0. 69β — meaning STRW is approximately 1297% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Belpointe PREP, LLC (OZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus -1. 8% for Global Medical REIT Inc. (GMRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -94. 6% for Global Medical REIT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OZ leads at 39. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -891. 8% for Belpointe PREP, LLC — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRW leads at 52. 4% versus -504. 3% for OZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 2. 34x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 595. 7x for Global Medical REIT Inc. — 576. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST?
In this comparison, GMRE (63.
5% yield), GOOD (11. 4% yield), STRW (4. 4% yield), NTST (4. 1% yield) pay a dividend. OZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OZ or STRW or GMRE or GOOD or NTST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +40. 7%, OZ: -49. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OZ and STRW and GMRE and GOOD and NTST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock; GMRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock. STRW, GMRE, GOOD, NTST pay a dividend while OZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.