Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PAC vs JBLU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
PAC vs JBLU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $10.79B | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.53B | $9.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10.36B | $-713M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | 54.0% | -4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $46.66B | $10.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.45B | $2.05B |
PAC vs JBLU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (PAC) | 100 | 378.4 | +278.4% |
| JetBlue Airways Cor… (JBLU) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAC vs JBLU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- 219.5% 10Y total return vs JBLU's -73.6%
In this particular matchup, JBLU is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs JBLU's -2.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs JBLU's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs JBLU's 2.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs JBLU's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs JBLU's -4.1%, ROIC 21.9% vs -2.7% |
PAC vs JBLU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PAC vs JBLU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.5B annually — 3.6x JBLU's $9.2B. PAC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBLU's -7.8%. On growth, JBLU holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32.5B | $9.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.3B | $281M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10.4B | -$713M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.9B | -$950M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +39.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +54.0% | -4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | -7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | -10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.8% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -47.5% |
Valuation Metrics
JBLU leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PAC's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JBLU's 31.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.8B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.9B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.89x | -3.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.05x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.42x | 31.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.72x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.81x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.79x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAC delivers a 41.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-33 for JBLU. PAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBLU's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAC scores 8/9 vs JBLU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.7% | -33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.8% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.9% | -2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.5% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.88x | 4.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36.2B | $8.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.5B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46.7B | $10.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.99x | -0.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAC five years ago would be worth $26,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,623 for JBLU. Over the past 12 months, PAC leads with a +16.9% total return vs JBLU's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAC at 15.4% vs JBLU's -10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.9% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.8% | -27.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.2% | -73.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.5% | -73.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.4% | -10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
PAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBLU's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAC currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs JBLU's 78.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $300.41 | $6.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $206.91 | $3.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +78.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 27.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PAC as "Hold" and JBLU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.3% upside for JBLU (target: $6) vs 3.5% for PAC (target: $260). PAC is the only dividend payer here at 3.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $260.00 | $6.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $168.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
PAC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JBLU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PAC vs JBLU: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAC or JBLU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU). Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (1. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PAC or JBLU?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) delivered a total return of +166. 2%, compared to -73. 8% for JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAC returned +219. 5% versus JBLU's -73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PAC or JBLU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus JetBlue Airways Corporation's 2. 11β — meaning JBLU is approximately 258% more volatile than PAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 188% versus 5% for JetBlue Airways Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PAC or JBLU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus -2. 3% for JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JetBlue Airways Corporation grew EPS 27. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAC leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PAC or JBLU?
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus -6. 6% for JetBlue Airways Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAC leads at 54. 0% versus -4. 1% for JBLU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAC leads at 77. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PAC or JBLU more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBLU: 20.
3% to $6. 17.
07Which pays a better dividend — PAC or JBLU?
In this comparison, PAC (3.
9% yield) pays a dividend. JBLU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PAC or JBLU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 3. 9% yield, +219. 5% 10Y return). JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAC: +219. 5%, JBLU: -73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PAC and JBLU?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JBLU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PAC pays a dividend while JBLU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.