Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PASG logo
PASG
ILMN logo
ILMN
PACB logo
PACB
NTLA logo
NTLA
CRSP logo
CRSP
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PASG
Passage Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$24.60B
5Y Perf.-55.0%
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$435M
5Y Perf.-59.4%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.76B
5Y Perf.-25.5%
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$5.22B
5Y Perf.-26.4%

PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PASG logoPASG
ILMN logoILMN
PACB logoPACB
NTLA logoNTLA
CRSP logoCRSP
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$18M$24.60B$435M$1.76B$5.22B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$4.39B$160M$66M$4M
Net Income (TTM)$-38M$853M$-129M$-395M$-569M
Gross Margin67.1%37.1%-31.9%-53.6%
Operating Margin20.9%-101.7%-6.4%-134.1%
Forward P/E31.0x
Total Debt$24M$2.55B$759M$93M$395M
Cash & Equiv.$46M$1.42B$64M$155M$355M

PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PASG
ILMN
PACB
NTLA
CRSP
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG)1001.0-99.0%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10045.0-55.0%
Pacific Biosciences… (PACB)10040.6-59.4%
Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)10074.5-25.5%
CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP)10073.6-26.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Passage Bio, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ILMN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PASG
Passage Bio, Inc.
The Growth Leader

PASG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 39.6% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
Best for: growth
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 1.02
  • 19.4% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
  • Beta 1.02 vs PASG's 3.30, lower leverage
  • +79.4% vs PASG's -28.4%
Best for: income & stability
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

PACB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.1%
Best for: growth exposure
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
The Long-Run Compounder

CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 283.9% 10Y total return vs ILMN's 18.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.94, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 13.32x
  • Beta 1.94, current ratio 13.32x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPASG logoPASG39.6% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 1.02 vs PASG's 3.30, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ILMN logoILMN+79.4% vs PASG's -28.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs PASG's -59.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -141.9%

PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PASGPassage Bio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M
PACBPacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
45.9%$136M
Consumable
27.7%$82M
Instrument
18.2%$54M
Service And Other
8.2%$24M
NTLAIntellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRSPCRISPR Therapeutics AG
FY 2025
Grant
100.0%$4M

PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGNTLA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN and PASG operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPASG logoPASGPassage Bio, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$4.4B$160M$66M$4M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$41M$1.1B-$151M-$411M-$531M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$38M$853M-$129M-$395M-$569M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$989M-$116M-$364M-$401M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.1%+37.1%-31.9%-53.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.9%-101.7%-6.4%-134.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.4%-80.3%-6.0%-138.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.5%-72.6%-5.5%-97.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.8%+0.1%-9.5%+68.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.4%+6.1%+97.9%+26.4%+19.0%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PASG and PACB and CRSP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricPASG logoPASGPassage Bio, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$18M$24.6B$435M$1.8B$5.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M$25.7B$1.1B$1.7B$5.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.39x29.71x-0.77x-4.11x-8.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.02x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.67x2.72x25.98x1486.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x9.28x78.51x2.53x2.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.42x
Evenly matched — PASG and PACB and CRSP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-5 for PACB. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPASG logoPASGPassage Bio, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-150.9%+32.8%-4.9%-57.3%-30.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-59.8%+13.4%-16.1%-46.1%-24.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-141.9%+16.8%-45.8%-44.0%-22.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-70.6%+17.6%-58.0%-48.5%-26.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–918341
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.28x0.94x141.98x0.14x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$22M$1.1B$696M-$62M$40M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$46M$1.4B$64M$155M$355M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$2.6B$759M$93M$395M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.09x-44.67x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CRSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CRSP five years ago would be worth $4,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $195 for PASG. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +79.4% total return vs PASG's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRSP at -1.7% vs PACB's -52.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPASG logoPASGPassage Bio, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-52.2%+20.5%-23.9%+70.1%+0.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-28.4%+79.4%+6.9%+63.2%+21.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.8%-17.6%-89.3%-64.1%-4.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%-63.5%-95.2%-79.4%-57.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%+18.9%-84.3%-43.2%+283.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-32.9%-6.2%-52.6%-28.9%-1.7%
CRSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PASG's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs PASG's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPASG logoPASGPassage Bio, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.30x1.02x2.61x2.47x1.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.00$177.22$2.73$28.25$78.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.94$88.00$1.09$7.95$42.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+28.0%+91.4%+51.3%+55.5%+68.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.654.245.259.852.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded86K1.7M6.0M7.0M1.7M
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ILMN as "Buy", PACB as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.8% upside for NTLA (target: $26) vs -28.6% for PACB (target: $1).

MetricPASG logoPASGPassage Bio, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$151.40$1.00$26.13$71.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts50183938
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRSP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PASG vs ILMN vs PACB vs NTLA vs CRSP: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

(NTLA) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 29. 7x trailing P/E (31. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP?

Over the past 5 years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) delivered a total return of -57.

7%, compared to -98. 1% for Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +283. 9% versus PASG's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Passage Bio, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning PASG is approximately 225% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

(NTLA) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTLA: 66.

8% to $26. 13.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is PASG or ILMN or PACB or NTLA or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02)). Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) carries a higher beta of 3. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +18. 9%, PASG: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PASG and ILMN and PACB and NTLA and CRSP?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PASG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.